difficult to recall all the events. i definitely remember him saying, we re going to support the conservative party. i wouldn t forget that. i think he gave me a hint of timing and my memory is, it was mostly about the big economic picture, because that was the key issue of the day. well this was within about two weeks of his taggert lecture. had you anything before december 10, 2009? no. had the gist of it been drawn to your attention. i read it after the press reports, but i never record in preparation for all this. he had very strong views. some of the things i didn t agree with, on things like the bbc. we had a clear position. dates right back to the council. you need have the license fee, and it s a i say, off come the blue jean, we ve had an opportunity atlantic. and amp he described himself very force blip in the lecture this is within two weeks of the lechture lecture, it s more than plausible he might have came to you on these malters on one or more occasio
the aclu has believe for some time that police departments around the world are attracting people s cell phones and make regular basis off and not getting aeah staff attorney will talk about whether current law adequately protect an individual s right to privacy at 8:00 eastern on the communicators, and cspan to. -2. i live in yukon, okla.. this weekend, our local content vehicles explore the culture of oklahoma city including the works of galileo at the history of science collection at oklahoma university. the most important part of this book is on motion and when this book was published in 1632, the pope was angry that galileo had broken his promise to treat this hypothetically. this resulted in his trial and this is also a copy that contains his own handwriting so this is like being able to look over his shoulder in the months leading up to his trial and all next week and, the local content vehicle in oklahoma city on book-tv and american history tv. coming up n
yes. anyone who puts faith in confidentiality agreements it s too by eve to be true. you knew there was a confidentiality agreement associated with that assessment, didn t you? i was told that. you might have assumed it wasn t worth the paper was written on. i thought about it. yes. didn t you think about it? know. no. i have a lot of things to think about and i didn t give it a lot of attention. in july of 2011 just bear with me. these conversations with your son, was there any discussion about the need to avoid reputation with to the company? not on those terms, no. anything that involves ethical behavior or unethical behavior or reputation of behavior you don t have to state them and those words. [unintelligible] this guy was blackmailing us to keep quiet because there was a massive reputation of harm to the company. he did not say that. anything like that? no. did you suspect by july, 2009, the one road reporter defense was wearing a bit th