In a surprising move, YouTube has made a significant shift in its election integrity policy. The tech giant has now decided to permit the presence of YouTube's decision to allow content alleging fraud, errors, and glitches in the 2020 elections has generated controversy. Critics fear the spread of misinformation, while conservatives see it as an opportunity for open dialogue. Explore the implications of this reversal and its potential impact on future elections.
we are going to let him go to the united states. it s going to continue to serve his peruvian sentence. they re going to let the justice system to decide the fraud allegations against natalie holloway s mother. if he is convicted in the united states he will go back for it is kind of convoluted, to peru to serve the sentence of the murder of the peruvian woman. when he is so with that sentence he will be returned to the united states to serve the sentence for conviction of a wire fraud and the fraud he committed on natalie holloway s mom. that carries up to 50 years in the united states pretty has a 28 year sentence right now. so essentially they are allowing the judicial process to occur here so can be secured without being compromised we know as prosecutors, after many years cases get weak, they finally make the decision let the american justice system adjudicated there.
was, when they left the white house. suddenly they heard these tears, and that is when people said, some people said they started crying. reporter: all those phone calls, president obama made to tell other world leaders about the bin laden raid, according to obama s memoir, when he told an pakistani president about it, his reply was, quote, whatever the fallout is, it is very good news, , that despite the public backlash from the pakistani government. expressing serious displeasure with the raid, anderson? still to come, the washington post reporting that previously unknown evidence obtained by the special counsel s office. looking into efforts to overturn the election. knew that there fraud allegations were false, we talk about it with harvard law school professor. also tonight, republicans raising questions about president biden s while talking with reporters, dr. sanjay gupta joins us then.
president. his advice was only that he should pause the certification of the election, giving legislators more time to consider fraud allegations in certain states where trump had lost. the problem with eastman s version of events is that it differs greatly from what others are saying, including vice president mike pence. the former vp said that on january 5th, simply reject the rightful electors from those seven swing states. who do you believe? next week, january 24th, they will determine whether to make public trump s efforts to steal the election in that state. the focus of that investigation has been fake electors plots, and john eastman as a potential target. joining us now is barbara mcquade. the eastern district of michigan, and now professor at university of michigan law school. thank you for being here