Name is my name namely kelly good on the city of mississauga city and county of San Francisco. [applause] thank you my fan club fan club there and about. But welcome to the city of San Francisco and welcome to usf. Today we are gathered here as beneficiaries of the civil rights movement. To celebrate the 50th anniversary of the march on washington. I am proud to stand before you as the first africanamerican, first woman city administrator. [applause] thank you. I i am grateful to be inspired and mentored by many great civil rights leaders and my educational leaders which includes usf law school. [applause] and my family members who have mentored me and have paved the way for me along my career path. I could not have gotten there without them. My greatest inspirations are my parents William Little and maria little, and i my greatest inspirations are my parents William Little and maria little, and i want to talk about howthey were inspired by the march on washington and dr. Kings speech
Three jays, jobs, justice and jubilee in my capacity as a public service. I will continue to ensure equal opportunity for all to compete in the public competitive contracting process. We will continue to fight for local jobs for those who can need jobs. We will continue to fight for justice for people who will serve despite their ethnic background, religion, Economic Immigration status and their government and their policies and process. As for jubilee,it gives me such joy that we just recently celebrated this historical victory of the samesex marriages in San Francisco is the first county Clerks Office in this state to say open california to perform ceremonies for samesex couples during our pride weekend. [applause] we can continue to celebrate these historical events diverse cultures inheritances that make San Francisco unique. 50 years ago dr. King i have a dream speech inspired and changed many lives. We as beneficiaries, of his legacy and of the civil right movement can keep his d
I think in phase 1 were paying the base rent. Thank you. Any other questions . Comments . I might have more than one, but if i was reading the numbers right, simon, is yours going to cost about less than 40 million to do phase 1 and 2, or was that 26 million just infrastructure . Excuse me. The 26 million infrastructure, project costs 118 million, roughly in the same ballpark with tax credits. About 100 million. And can you guys both just give me a cursory review of what your maritime components will be . [laughter] you know, i beat him because i put this little selflaunch crane in. He missed my little selflaunch 4,000 pound crane. Theres one over in marina and sauselido where the public can go. I beat him. [laughter] thank you, commissioner. Obviously maritime uses are important, both because it takes advantage of this wonderful asset on the water and because its so important for trust consistency and bcdc approve. I think our proposals are very similar. In both cases i think the team
109 which is also, a contributing resource and in this case is Significant Resource part of the park. And building 30 which is also within the park area. Contributing resource and the historic iron seeing along illinois street and that is also a contributing resource. And this shows the shore line condition at piers one through three closest to the shipyard on the edge of the park and some of the Industrial Artifacts and the various machinery. And okay. So, in terms of the actual planning, process, the park plan, and had to address the challenges of how do you, convert an Industrial Site into a park and accommodate the new functions . It also had to deal with balancing the history and preservation and historic interpretation of the site with this open space programming and recreation. It also had to look at the various uses of the district of the slip way and also, it looked at the charactered and defining features of the slip way which includes the cranes 1430 and the runway and the u
Little bit and reassure you a lot. The scare you part is that commissioner arce, youre absolutely right. They could set the not to exceed rate next week. They could move forward with a Shell Program and no other program, which as i said is only less than 4 of what we envision. So, but with that said, the reason that advocates have recently voted and said to the sfpuc and to lafco we would like them to proceed with these not to exceed rates is because they are now competitive with pg e. Especially if you compare it to a pg e green rate. And what ms. Malcolm proposed to us tonight are rates that will probably be even more competitive, even competitive with pg es brown power rate. The issue with the shell contract is that whether we like it or not, the local buildout that we all want is no longer tied to the small phase 1 part of the program. Its no longer tied to the shell contract. So, the reality is now that the shell contract is going to have competitive rates if the sfpuc sets compet