First, were talking tact weather. So lets get the latest on the Power Outages happening in the area. Put your dwoes us on Facebook Live right now and well try to answer them as well. Is red flag warning is in effect until friday afternoon this fire danger is forcing pg e to warn n customers wherever except francisco and morin for now that there might be these shutoffs. They say theyre expecting any power shutoff to first start around 6 00 p. M. Tonight and others would start in stages after that. Power likely wouldnt be stief restore until its safe to do the powerlines. That could be thursday or friday night. Right now on our website and our free app we have easy tips for how to prepare for these shutoffs and this address guide to find out if your home is in a potential shutoff area. So take a look at that. As do you and as you explore that power outage, as you see it, no public power shutoffs have gone into nekt our area, meaning you still have time to prepare. Joining us, our very ow
Culture of corruption that pervades the city, i believe that she should voluntarily resign. I cant help but believe that the Mayors Office is in Crisis Communications mode. Intends to repay. I do not care about who dated who when, but i do care. Sub ordinates giving their bosses gifts, not reporting those gifts, there are gift limits under the law. They are far below 5,600. I want to be clear the gift is not reportable. Under our fpc laws in checking with my attorney, based on our relationship, this is not a reportable gift. Im not required by any laws to provide this information but i felt it was important to do so for the sake of full transparency to put it out there. He was arrested two weeks ago on fraud charges, all laid out in a complaint that allege as twisted government description scandal involve willing restauranture nick bovis. The supervisor thinks the mayor should step back temporarily while an investigation is completed and San Franciscos new District Attorney says that h
Insufficient or inadequate. They believe the circumstance eirs were not enough as well as a different project to be approved. Sequa requires study of a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives, promoting informed decisionmaking and public participation. Here, the eir presented circumstance alternatives including two full preservation and too preservation alternatives. Lhias position is that ten alternatives should have been study. This is unnecessary and not required by sers qua. Sequa. This contains the legally required reasonable range and provides ample information for analysis and consideration by you, the decision makers. And for an additional alternative not in the eir to be legally ar required, it must be different from those presented in the eir and must clearly lessen the projects significant impacts. On the last day of the Public Comment period, lhia submitted narratives and sketches for two projects and followed up with two more after the final er was published
Reduce loading impacts as dwell times for trucks and loading times would be reduced so they could get in and out of the building. This is not sequa issue. The appellant fails to meet the burden that the record supports reversal of the Planning Commission and dpw. It did not and cannot provide evidence in support of its evidence. The records supporting the determinations is thorough consisting of multiple years of study and analysis and based on facts and evidence rather than argument and infect allegation. Speculation. This project will transform and underutilized wallofftioff tens sites with 744 new homes. , 185 affordable units for seniors, childcare uses and neighborhood serving retail and commercial uses. We ask you reject these appeals and move forward today. Thank you, supervisors. Thank you. Any questions . I have a question of the proje project, is there a reason why it was infeasible to make a family unit affordable . So this project through the Development Agreement, it was d
Consistent with the policies and objectives of the citys general plan. The appeal also demands specific modifications to the project including the following. Limiting the height and modifications to the reuse Center Buildings and a reduction of the new building near laurel and euclid to preserve more open space and further limits on the types of nonresidential uses proposed. Related to the height of the Center Buildings, the Planning Commission supported the overall scale including the height because their placement in the center of the site set back from the public rights of way was a project objective. The project would place shorter buildings along the perimeter between 40 and 65 feet to serve the transition to the taller buildings in the center. A reduction in height of the Center Building would result in a reduction in dwelling unit count or to keep the unit count consistent, 744, and increase to other proposed New Buildings along the perimeter and compromising the compatibility.