An alternate standard, obviously there are a number of alternate standards that can be applied. But the important thing to remember is that this program is a discovery program. The whole idea of the program is to identify avenues that warrant investigation into rollout avenues that do not warrant investigation. And the more that you require of the more that you add on to the standard that is required before you can even investigate less useful tool becomes. For example, if you talk about reason to believe the number me lead to contact in the United States, that is exactly what we are trying to find out here. We have got a number. If we have a terrorist phone number, what exactly we are trying to find out is do we have information to think that this may lead to the drooping investigation in the United States . One quick thing, raj, if i could. On the question of followup, there is a very close review of the ras determination itself. What is your review of how the fbi uses the informatio
Not be letting when we give them the Good Housekeeping seal of approval, which is what this security clearance is, that ought to mean something. And if they breach it, that ought for something that we consider very serious with very serious consequences. And so i applaud your work. I would like to know how many have actually been discharged or disciplined for either lying on applications. Obviously they wouldnt get the clearance. But not reporting after the fact. Mr. Chairman, again, thank you for the time. Thanks. Those were tough questions. Senator mccaskill. I think one of the most revealing things this morning is the realization that while an arrest report may be part of a background check, there is not a requirement that the underlying Police Report be obtained. And i tell you why this is a shocking revelation. Like senator ayotte, im a former prosecutor, and the vast majority of cases that would review a mental disturbance will not have a disposition. The criminal Justice System
The court hate oral argument on the case in september. This is 40 minutes. Good morning your honors. I am Francis Manion representing the appellate in this case. The central christian in this case should be whether the government has shown a compelling interest in forcing this particular Family Business to include contraception in its health plans against the familys religious beliefs at the same time the government has decided not to impose that same requirements on millions of other employers for both religious and nonreligious region reasons. The District Court never reach this question because contrary to Supreme Courts teaching in the case it focused on the formal identity of the parties instead of on the law that we say and that the government acknowledges implicates religious liberty interests. The District Court did answer these two questions first whether or not gilardi is substantially burdened by the hhs this hhs mandate and the court encrypt they said no. The court incorrec
Sixth Circuit skeptical of buffer zone at Louisville abortion clinic courthousenews.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from courthousenews.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.