The task is broader here, so they did not combine, so as not to simplify the situation, to diversify a little. Today , only the Russian Orthodox church is a fullfledged ideological institution in this system, in united russia, what ideology is there, steal and run, and the Russian Orthodox church after all ideological institute. Lets start with the fact that i generally believe that religion and ideology are one and the same. They say that god exists, this is already an ideology. Than united russia, the leading party, what can it justify, there is only bureaucracy, what they can invent, and the Russian Orthodox church says, we and the new ideology, according to which the current government has a direct entrance to god, it is a direct reflection of him, the orthodox kingdom, русский peace, all that set that we hear from time to time, but he cant. And this inauguration, if it has any significance, is not as much protocol as ideological. War and the immutability of this power in a
Many different optimistic scenarios, about how, i dont know, the mausoleum will be set on fire in response. Mr. Colonel, you have the floor. As i said, i dont think putin will use Nuclear Weapons, because i think that would be unwise. He has no trained troops to oppose him consequences, so it would create as many, if not more, problems for him than for the ukrainian side. The first thing that will happen in response is massive. A counterattack by air forces along the russian front line, because in this case it makes no sense to drive the west out with a wedge, it has a lot of ground and air capabilities to react, so such things are practiced, and they know what to do. In this regard, i believe that we pay too much attention to putins rhetoric. A few things have happened since we last spoke quite important events. Macron said he would be ready to deploy Ground Troops under certain circumstances. It is not clear what the circumstances are, but at least he made such a commitment. In addit
Or Great Britain, they absolve themselves of responsibility, they supply the weapons, and now the weapons are ukrainian, not french and not british, because this is stupidity, it would remain so if the french themselves carried out the strikes with scalp or storm shadow and the british, but not this one happening, it is done by ukraine, what difference does it make, what do they use . Moscow uses iranian shaheds, so what . Therefore, the meaning is that this is essentially an attempt to influence. On the position of these countries , taking into account what france constantly says, in the person of president macron, starting from february 26, that the French Military contingent can be sent to the territory of ukraine on the condition that there is a front breakthrough, or if zelenskyi asks for it, the zelenskyi government kyiv will make a request, invite these contingents, maybe it will be French Foreign legion or something else, i dont know exactly how this is decided in the respectiv
The use of article five or even article four for negotiations, so we are not sure how strong the collective european responsibility will be if the war turns in russias favor, and yet i am sure that by they will reach a common denominator in this regard, because poland, germany, france and Great Britain fear that the situation will worsen and affect them. There are currently no concrete plans or. Decisions, there is a recognition that we may have to resort to more serious action. However, i believe that there is not only recognition, but also readiness for such actions. Recently, the president of the United States signed macroeconomic aid for ukraine, more than 61 billion dollars. The amount is huge. On the other hand, we are also aware that the russians are throwing in its defense is also huge money. Well , actually, if you try to compare now. Here are the proportions, this is not about money, but about specific military equipment, i dont think that the russian side manages to equalize
Advancement is not an easy task. The key story is the goals of war, so in order to plan and deploy certain military capabilities. A couple of days ago, in a conversation with me, matthew bryza, ex the director of european and Eurasian Affairs at the National Security council of the United States, said that the russians will advance during this year, and we can wait for a counterattack next year on the 25th. From the armed forces of ukraine. Subsequently, this information was confirmed literally in a couple of days by jake sullivan, president Joseph Bidens adviser on National Security. And the russians have already voiced their threats in case of supplying ukraine with f16s. They somehow compared it even to the prospect of using or using Nuclear Weapons. That is, this story is much more serious for them, and they are afraid of it. What difference does it make, which, whose . The plan the priority was and remains the ukrainian plan. It is not about london, berlin or anyone else, it is ab