Point of really pushing that because we havent been faced with a situation desperate enough. If we have to, if we have to reimpose sanctions, that is the way to do it. And give countries that choice and give the ayatollah that choice of whether he wants to see total economic collapse or real compromise on his Nuclear Program. Gentleman yields back his time. The gentleman from georgia, mr. Collins is recognized. Thank you, mr. Chair. Mr. Chairman its good to have you serving on the Foreign Affairs before this congress. Im not going to stay long here. It just bothers me as one who, frankly i voted just a few months ago even against this. I felt like we left the moorings a long time ago. Its amazing in the last six to eight months hearing the administration going from well never allow them to have Nuclear Weapons and well do everything in our power, well well let them get them in a certain timeframe. As one who also served in iraq back in 2008, it really the issue with the irg, mr. Chairm
You turn coal into gas, it goes through fewer cells before so you get three generations here. That is the promising technology. Having in mind this understanding, this is our technology that we are working hard. Commercially speaking, the best agency that is achieved today is 43. But the plan is to achieve up to 65 by 2050. We are working very hard to achieve this by 2050. However, the point is while we are working very hard for technology on the future, the plans are standing up today and that is why we have to talk about using what is available today. So, now moving on to that, they use what is available today. So first of all how does it look this is a picture from the best plant in japan and also in the world. This is another picture from the plant shown in the Previous Panel that there isnt a preferred picture. The plant was beautiful in the picture but the difference is you see the residential houses on the bottom. You will see that its so close to the coal power plants it just m
Ensure that can help companies area. Orward in that we have a few Different Things that are happening right now. Of Technological Development for encryption protocols that has the to makety Communications End to end secure, to cure devices in ways never been able to do before. If youre interested in software on your machine you can voluntarily obtain that Software Much whats lookrning is that if you at the, let me throw this out to the audience. How many much you encrypt your email voluntarily, manned hands. Number,n amazingly high how many of you are lying . How many of you use apple i to send texts to other people . Really, so thats really were. Not what i expected. Is a problem is that we now rely on centralized providers like google and apple take that technology which outside of this room is very itrly deployed and put interest product that everybody can use much if that process does not happen or if that process is circumstance cup cup gllz tblz the security benefits from encrypt
Automatically, and you are going through your world whether your smartphone or your credit card, you are doing this hundreds of times a day, maybe. All ofue is nsa can use that to establish a profile. That is a good thing. Why do you have to do it to hundreds of millions of innocent people . That is a problem. That is where i have a problem. I do not want to hurt nsa. I served 30 years there. And it is a needed capability to keep us safe, but my goodness, we need to observe the three legs of the government, the legislative process, to the judiciary, as it was always intended. We do not need to say that we are at perpetual war and can never go back to a democratic visible. We need to get away from that. And that is on the idea that theres a lot of information that is limited to the dish it to the leadership. I can only speak to what ive that is really quite only for sensitive operations. Abbotobad aid on when youre talking about the kinds of things from the surveillance nsa does, those
From Anbar Province in the 1991 gulf war, and now it gets to the long range rocket threat to israel from southern lebanon in 2006 or from gaz a saw let me intervene. You just listed examples to allies in the midst of war. If its 1972, the American Public is facing 25,000 Nuclear Weapons targeting it. So thats where i think the, in terms of it may be existential to those local actors, but in terms of the American Publics viewpoint of it, is it viewed that, to me, is the disconnect. We dont view it as existential. With yeah. I think thats correct. And so, of course, its incumbent upon the three of you to explain that. So, bill and then were going to open it up. [laughter] you know, very quickly, first, you know, to my good friend, michael hanlon, who may be regretting having tendered this invitation this is why we want you. Go for it. The point, you know, the point i was making does not pertain principally to the wars that we are now in, it pertains to the willingness of the American Peo