Terrified by the idea that bytr the administration is trying to control what you say and think t because they re notha allowed to do that . those rights are given to you by god, freedom of thought, freedom of conscience bdo, peri. this is republicans and it s not just about nina jankowicz is likee a total idiot, obviously, but you never know that from watching televisionwa watch the administration s allies in the mediatcs. n there s been an uproar in recent days about the department of homeland security setting uppd se what ta call a disinformation governance board. this has been mostly a fox world story. it could come up earlier today on cnn state of the union.hat ia but i don t thinknd people know what it is and what it isn t. and there s just been h a lot of right wing uproar without knowing what it is being a stronger advocate to tech companies and engaging the public in academiach, that . really what they re after. well, that sounds like common sense, butut when i google this, all
Of leftist truth. watch this. in the u.s. there s been an uproar in recent days about the department from unsecured he setting up what the color disinformation governance board. this is been mostly of fox world story. come up early on cnn s state of the union but it don t think people know what it is and what it isn t and is just been a lot of right wing uproar without knowing what it is. sean: keep in mind, the dhs, they were founded after 9/11, we lost nearly 3,000 of our fellow americans. they were designed to prevent another 9/11, another attack on the homeland. but under secretary mayorkas, the department has now turned their focus inward? a complete dereliction of duty, a complete retreat from a post-9/11 world and policies to keep every american in this country safe from terrorists. by the way, how many terrorist encounters did they have at the border? 41? we don t even know. how many people might have snuck in that we don t know about? and according to him, disinformation a
Administration is trying to control what you say and think, because they are not allowed to do that, those rights are given to you by god. freedom of thought, freedom of conscience, period. if it s not just about nina janco it s, who is a total idiot, obviously, but you d never know that from watching television. watch the administration s allies in the media. there s been an uproar in recent days about the department of homeland security setting up what they call it disinformation governance board. this is been mostly a fox world story. come up earlier on state of the union but i don t think people know what it is and what it isn t, and has just been a lot of right wing uproar without knowing what it is. being a stronger advocate to tech companies and engaging the public and academia, that s really what they re after. that sounds like common sense. but when i googled us all i see is joe biden s ministry of truth, and they are going to you know, there s this incredible backlash
Immigration, they re worried about crime, they re worried about the ability to make ends meet and those are the sorts of things if they feel they re not getting coverage from a certain media source on the things they re worried about, they ll go find it somewhere else. does that mean republican narratives are beating democratic narratives? when i hear you say they re worried about crime, i kind of hear a republican narrative. i don t think being concerned about crime is necessarily a republican narrative. i think a lot of swing voters would push back. i mean talk about the story a lot. i think the media does but this is a moment at least in the research i m seeing, swing voters in the middle, their priorities look a little more like the priorities of republican voters. back in 2018 i would have said the opposite. you had swing voters in the middle worrying about things like pre-existing conditions, health care and didn t like donald trump very much. in 2018, those swing voters
Able to neutralize or change. is there an example that you could point to as a great one? probably the greatest example is the limiting reach on rt and shutting down rt both in ukraine but also in the european union. that s probably been the greatest example and here in the united states undermining their finance to limit the spread of russia today. and that really shows us how that mobilization of the market, of governments working together, can really change the dynamic of how we see war play out in our family rooms as we watch it play out on the battlefield. right, in our family rooms. here in the u.s. there s been an uproar in recent days about the department of homeland security setting up what they call a disinformation governance board. this has been mostly a fox world story. it did come up earlier today on cnn s state of the union, but i don t think people know what it is and what it isn t. there s a lot of right wing uproar about knowing what it is. are you aware of this