did have to walk away because it is so disturbing. i admired you so much for having sat through there in the courtroom and being the witness for all of us. and then so calmly, but with some compassion describing what was happening in the legal process. it was an amazing special. thank you. big, big media presence throughout the arias trial. and now the mainstream media is catching up to kimberly and her special and the other people covering it all along in the gosnell trial. why? dana had a right. fox was the one that drove this story. there is no excuse for something like this. this is the most blatant example of abortion as i have ever heard of and it should have been covered. yes, it is uncomfortable. yes, the pictures are gruesome. you don t have to report all that. you can report other facts and not show pictures. i don t buy that argument at all. you are coming around. greg? what is left to say? if there is any justice in this world gosnell would be
testimony, transcripts from the courtroom out of the mouths of the witnesses who were present at the time when these crimes were committed by dr. gosnell and his staff. the defense attorney said what? the defense attorney was very angry, upset with it and wanted to talk to the judge and question the jurors in particular to see if anyone had seen the fox news special and whether or not it would influence their decision. this is no surprise having tried high-profile cases defense attorneys do this when there is media coverage because they say maybe the jury was influenced. they try and get a mistrial and a juror excused so the case has to be retried. he certainly wouldn t have had to ask about seeing it on any other network. fox was the one that did most of the coverage, drove it, social media as well making sure that the media held to account and make sure they were there. you actually went. yes. i have to tell you, so on friday night i hadn t been home on a week night in a lo
cryptic message about infidelity before her solo trip. in a instn instagram, he said dt cheat in a relationship. if you re unhappy leave and posting a real relationship is where you can tell everyone everything and anything, no secrets and no lies. there s more. fox s new york reporter lisa everett with the latest. i guess now the fbi has turned a corner on this thinking of what this woman was up to et cetera. yes, they definitely have, and there s now information, and those messages i checked before we came on, those are still posted on steven sierra s instagram account and late tonight told a new york newspaper that those messages are not an indication of marital discord or problems. he s claiming that he posted those in order to warn other couples. this man has been under tremendous strain.
cryptic message about infidelity before her solo trip. in a instn instagram, he said dt cheat in a relationship. if you re unhappy leave and posting a real relationship is where you can tell everyone everything and anything, no secrets and no lies. there s more. fox s new york reporter lisa everett with the latest. i guess now the fbi has turned a corner on this thinking of what this woman was up to et cetera. yes, they definitely have, and there s now information, and those messages i checked before we came on, those are still posted on steven sierra s instagram account and late tonight told a new york newspaper that those messages are not an indication of marital discord or problems. he s claiming that he posted those in order to warn other couples. this man has been under tremendous strain. late last week he had to tell
to cut spending. willy-nilly, though. so the sequester is willy-nilly, isn t it? you wouldn t want to cut having the sequester do it? didn t congress make the sequester? that was a carrot and stick situation. the sequester is the stick. the problem is you can t get the president of the united states to put alternative cuts on the board. he ll talk in generalities. and the republicans and the democrats don t trust each other. so yes, i don t like the ad hoc approach, but given the choice between an ad hoc approach and no approach at all with trillion-dollar deficits every year, i choose cuts. but let s talk about this. how badly do you think it will hurt the economy? you think the wall street journal s underselling it? i do think they re underselling it. first, half a percentage point of gdp is very significant. if you re talking about government, the business of government being a part of gdp and you re saying you re discounting that, okay, fair enough. but these are real