republican congressman jim jordan for seeking to interfere with the ongoing criminal investigation. from that times report, quote, the 50-page suit filed in federal court in the southern district of new york accuses jordan of a, quote, brazen and unconstitutional attack on the prosecution of mr. trump and a, quote, transparent campaign to intimidate and attack the district attorney lawyers for bragg are seekinr ms congressional allies from enforcing a subpoena they sent to mark pomerpomerantz. mark pomerantz was a leader into the investigation of mr. trump he later wrote a book about the experience viewers of this program may remember he appeared here as well mr. pomerantz resigned last year after mr. bragg, after his first term in office decided not to seek an indictment of trump at the time mr. bragg s lawyers also intend to frercprevent any such lawsuii says is this where we start with our friends, the new york times glenn thrush is here also joining us the former chie
republican tried to ambush and hand fraudulent electors to mike pence on january 6th. those stories and reports are coming up. but after a hearing like today s we begin with something more fundamental than a legal breakdown, and more powerful, perhaps, than meticulously going through the evidence, though that also matters. right now we begin with this. what millions of americans saw and heard today from the top republican leader out of arizona in plain, serious, and stern testimony about the choices officials have to make, the tests that trump posed, tests that, by the way, many republicans have fail bid cowering to a would be autocrat by minimizing threats of violence and coups, by only speak out late, if at all. some have walked back from some of those public humiliations. others just live in them. but today s testimony by this republican here offers a view of what it looks like to stand up. i said, look, you are asking me to do something that is counter to my oath that i
on dominion and at one point, actually admonished lawyers for fox for withholding information about rupert murdoch s involvement in fox news that made it seem like he had a far left significant role in managing the network the junl said at one point to a fox lawyer, i have to be able to trust that when you talk to me is true and what you said wasn t in fact true what is the status of whether murdoch will testify in this trial? oh, he will the judge has said that fox can, sorry, that dominion can compel both murdochs to testify and that also they can compel suzanne scott, the chief executive of fox news, to testify as well. i think that s something we are virtually guaranteed to happen and it will be as you know, an
so you re in this weird power vacuum, weird in a weird power . we sometimes forgot that the right wing remembers not on the committee but they are not also to your point holding a lot of press conferences before and after. it s not like, okay, great, someone is prosecuting this case. it s not moral courage and that s why when you seep an eye on fox as a place when the conversations unfold, they are unfolding differently. you have a fox lawyer, a republican lawyer on fox today saying looks like he committed a crime, maybe. michael, thank you. we ll be right back with a preview of all the rumors and discussion of this new secret footage about trump and the white house coming out. footage about trump and the white house coming out okay. ges does okay we ve still got the best moves you ve ever seen good for you, but shingles doesn t care. because 1 in 3 people will get shingles, you need protection.