ordinarily there is a quite high standard. the judge is taking it seriously and there s quite a lot of allegations suggesting that what fox was doing during this period is credible. the fact that they were saying lies or making of statements about this was in fact credible and had serious injury to all of these companies in the marketplace. you mention the marketplace which, it may seem kind of odd that on matters as high import as democracy we still rely on private companies to adjudicate this, but that s generally how it works and thus, it s a question of whether this fox coverage was so harmful to them and also deliberately so. when you look at the billions at stake, on the one hand, we talk about not wanting big penalties that are capricious, because we don t want to kill speech. i want tucker carlson to be able to speak their mind and
Fans label British broadcaster 'disrespectful', as it airs lengthy pre-packaged segment criticising Qatar's human rights record instead of opening ceremony