and what happens now, which is the good news for the first amendment, is everybody has information available and great journalists like you and others at cnn and fox and et cetera give an analytical base on information that everybody has. he has the right to do the same thing. so he s just taking information that he has got and putting his own belief on it. and with all due respect, we re not giving opinions here. we re giving the facts here. because even as i said to our team of reporters and our contributor before, even donald trump s own attorneys in his campaign say there was no voter fraud. and the court filing opposing jill stein s recount petition, his attorneys wrote this, all available evidence suggests that the 2016 general election was not tainted by fraud or mistake. i want to move on from the subject, but, but he s disagreeing with his own attorneys. look, he has his own point of view, he has a basis for that
very good crowd counter at inaugurations, and i m even worse counter at voting. so, my expertise is not necessary. but here s what i would say. in his mind, he is taking information that he s got and he s rendering an opinion. and what happens now, which is the good news for the first amendment, is everybody has information available and great journalists like you and others at cnn and fox and et cetera give an analytical base on information that everybody has. he has the right to do the same thing. so he s just taking information that he has got and putting his own belief on it. and with all due respect, we re not giving opinions here. we re giving the facts here. because even as i said to our team of reporter and our contributor before, even donald trump s own attorneys and his campaigns say there was no voter fraud. and the court filing opposing jill stein s recount petition, his attorneys wrote this, all available evidence suggests that