but the players association says he should be banned for life. i want to bring in now cnn s sports analyst christine brennen. thank you, christine. i appreciate you joining us. the nba is facing major blow back for this decision. what is going on here? well, when a sponsor, don, starts to talk then people listen. that s exactly what happened with the washington football team with the racist nickname, all of a sudden one sponsor after another said you ve got to get rid of it, and within a few days a long-standing name, the skins, was gone. and i think that s the same what we re looking at here. it is stunning that he was suspended only one year. although, owners it s a different situation, unfortunately. to get rid of an owner in one of these leagues you have to have three fourths of the other owners agree to ged rid of that owner, and of course a lot of
an idea of a national security expert, democrats should rename build back better as the anti-inflation act of 2022 and put it in front of manchin co vote down.vo and six months later, that is sort of what they did. take a look at that again. here is the headline. manchin supports inflation reduction act of 2022. that is how democrats are shifting the narrative on this new slimmed down version of biden s legislative agenda. because many of the policies that the dems have been pushing all along, things like reducing drug price, taxing corporations, investing in new sources of energy, n these are all things that will help reduce inflation, and it comes at r a time when t debate about how america should tacklede inflation is heating u. today, federal reserve chairman jerome powell announced that the fed will increase interest rates byre another three fourths of a percentage point. that may seem like small change
anti-inflation act of 2022 and then put it in front of the mansion to vote down. and six months later, that is sort of what they just did. just take a look at that press release again. here is the headline. manchin supports inflation reduction act of 2022. that is how democrats are shifting the narrative on this new slim down version of biden s legislative agenda. because many of the policies that the dems have been pushing all along, things like reducing drug prices, tax and corporations, investing in new sources of energy, these are all things that will help reduce inflation. and it comes at a time when the debate about how america should tackle inflation is heating up. today, federal reserve chairman, powell said the fed will increase interest rates by another three fourths of a percentage point. that may sound like a small change, but with each increase in interest rate, the federal reserve increases cost from the role [interpreter] millions of regular americans. the cost of mo
and it comes at a time when the debate about how america should tackle inflation is heating up. today, federal reserve chairman, powell said the fed will increase interest rates by another three fourths of a percentage point. that may sound like a small change, but with each increase in interest rate, the federal reserve increases cost from the role [interpreter] millions of regular americans. the cost of mortgage, car loans, private student loan payments. those higher costs are not some bad side effect of the threats policy goals, rather increasing borrowing costs across the economy is the goal. it is which ron powell wants to happen. because when people have less money, the theory is they spend less money, and when people spend less money, inflation goes down. that is what we are talking about when we say the federal reserve is raising interest rates. and there is a case to be made that is the kind of tough medicine our economy needs right now to keep prices from continuing to so
people who absolutely can t debate because they are used to just falling away. i can t debate anybody who doesn t agree with me. he used to win it all the time anyway. emily: i guess the silver lining of this is that it provides, like a shark in the water, abundance and ease in that way, because they are just impacting themselves negatively. because the result is they are absolutely devoid of any kind of challenge, because robust debate is what leads to incredible conclusions and collaborations and heightened thought, not refusing to budge from your position. i was struck by this study that said a growing majority of college students believe in free speech, but how fast it plummeted. in 2016, almost three fourths of students felt free speech rights were secure, and now less than half do. in my law school, as president of the federalist society, my role is bringing the other side