Her series of hearings investigating competition Digital Markets. This one on the role of data and privacy and competition. I now recognize myself for an opening statement. I should state the obvious, im not the chairman of the subcommittee. The chairman will be in a few minutes. Digital technologies have provide americans with remarkable array of services. It is never been easy to share news and information to publish content and to commit it with loved ones. All at a moments notice. As the technological revolutions of the mask of this transmission has opened up about the power across our economy. It is support for congress to study understand of these imbalances are affecting americans when it is causing these asymmetries of power and whether these new and growing inequalities are compatible with our democratic values. The committee ongoing oversight of competition Digital Markets is a key part of this process. Todays hearing was examined the role that data plays in creating and main
War. Good morning. Fork you all for joining todays session. Its going to be really informative. So glad youre all here with this very distinguished panel. Leadership, ethics and Practice Initiative here at the elliott school. The goal of this initiative sponsored by our dean is to give ofater profile to the topics leadership, ethics and their Practical Application in the education of our students graduate and undergraduate. This initiative brings practitioners to the school to learn about ethical and leadership challenges those practitioners face and how they address them. The same bringing scholars to the school to address these very same topics. I would also like to mention this morning that we are being filmed by cspan history. So we are fortunate to have these proceedings recorded. Young people both in and out of faced huge questions during the vietnam war. Would they take a stand. How would they put their values into practice. How would they come together to make a difference . An
The argument annexed in case, thank you mister chief justice. Reasonable suspicion is the minimal standard,. Common sense judgment is the difference between ordinary suspicion experiences and hear the vehicle on the road the registered driver was incapable of operating the vehicle had to believe that under common sense to register shirt user was,. The common sense belief that, is the one that has been recognized by judges in 12 states, across the country, that is a findings, registered owner of the vehicle of the driver is a common sense influence, some may argue that the existence of her suspended. But the ugly 15 courts i just mention 11 of them have dealt with this process iteration, those have indicated that this reasonable suspicion continues to exist or, indeed, the factual critic of those, across the country, those are register, not register and continue to drive. Here deputy mayor, relied upon the common sense understanding, and at the pervasiveness of autumn a bill in the Unit
Glover. Suspicion permits investigation, commonsense judgment, experiences of reasonable suspicion. Here, the deputy found a vehicle in the road and learned the driver was incapable of operating the vehicle and had the belief under common sense registered owner was the likely driver. The commonsense belief that deputy mayor had is one that has been recognized by judges across findingtry and that is the registered vehicle registered driver as the owner of the vehicle is common sense. Of the 16 courts i just mentioned, 11 of them have dealt with this precise situation and the judges of those courts have indicated that reasonable suspicion continues to exist. The predicate for the habitual fire later law is that the registered owner make me continuing to drive and the only thing we are asking is whether or not there is reasonable suspicion to investigate further. Underthe deputy relied common sense giving that the registered owner was likely to be driving again. A phrase from terry, it wo
This case. 18556 kansas versus rover. Thank you mr. Chief jeff justice. The minimal standard in a break investigation upon an officer and Thomas Jefferson with expenses. Pulled the vehicle over in a stop in the individual for being habitual violator. That believe the deputy mayor had is one that was recognized in 12 states Supreme Court, for circuit courts appealed across the country and that is the finding and register owner of the vehicle has a driver with a common sense with absent to the contrary. Some may argue that the existence of a suspended license would undermine a suspicion with the 16 courts, 11 have dealt with this precise situation and the judges of those courts have indicated with reasonable suspicion continue to exist even in that circumstance. The factual predicate for the habitual violator ball across the country is that the registered owner may continue to drive. The only thing we are asking here deputy mayor that a register owner that was likely to be driving with a