because they are going to end affirmative action in it will be declared unconstitutional. the university of texas has tried to foster diversity. there have been a number of lawsuits about it. justice kennedy was the swing vote saying the diversity program at the university of texas was constitutional. he s going to leave. they re going to bring in someone who will vote like gorsuch and like clarence thomas, and there will be fewer black students at the university of texas. that s just part of what this decision means. steven, part of what you point out, we have heard some things from the president. what s interesting is the words we have heard in the past versus what the reality will be. we know a lot about this list. there aren t going to be a huge number of surprises there in terms of where these nominees would fall. but we look in the same interview with leslie stahl. he was asked about equality. he said it was settled. it settled in the supreme court.
questionnaire about why he did not disclose that his wife worked in the white house and had such a crucial role. it remains to be seen. the trump administration has been very successful at getting their nominees through. this has been one of their biggest legislative successes of the past year, and my guess is he probably still will get through. speaking of that, cedric richmond, who is the head of the congressional black caucus, questioned the attorney general about the diversity or lack of diversity of these nominees. in terms of nominating judges to the bench, our information tells us that out of all the judges that have been nominated, i think 91% have been white males. does that foster diversity? i m not aware of the numbers, but we should look for quality candidates, and i think diversity is a matter that has
procedure that they approved for that election. the texas legislature then repealed the previous law that had been found to be unconstitutional or improper. they passed the that the court approved. we felt that the voter id law has been approved. a proper voter id law is constitutional and we believe that is constitutional and that s why the position was changed. and also in judging the department of justice, in terms of nominating judges to the bench, our information tells us out of all the judges that have been nominated, i think 91% have been white males. does that foster diversity?
believe, and the court approved a voter i.d. procedure that they approved for that election, and the texas legislature then repealed its previous law that had been found to be unconstitutional or improper and had been approved. we felt a proper voter i.d. law is constitutional and we believe that one is constitutional. and referring to the department of justice, in terms of placing judges for the bench, out of all the judges that have been nominated, i think 91% have been white males. does that foster diversity?