oh yeah, we gotta take off. you downloaded the td ameritrade mobile app? yeah, actually i m taking one last look at my dashboard before we board. and you have thinkorswim mobile- -so i can finish analyzing the risk on this position. you two are all set. choose the app that fits your investing style. sandra: a jam-packed hour coming up. good afternoon. i am sandra smith in new york and everybody s talking about it. trace gallagher, the show skier. pictures coming up. trace: i m trace gallagher in for john roberts. justices side viewing with a catholic foster care agency after it refused to work with same-sex couples. jonathan turley will give his
interest and payments and debt. emily: fox news alert. it s been called a major victory for supporters of religious liberty is, the supreme court in that unanimous decision siding with the catholic foster care agency and in a dispute with the city of philadelphia. the justices ruling the city violated the u.s. constitution and banning a religious group from taking part in the city s foster care program because of its exclusion of same-sex couples.
when you see who is in the majority here, two off donald trump s appointees supported. gorsuch did not. the statement that comes from donald trump will be coming. let s switch gears to the other decision, and the case of a catholic foster care agency, and philadelphia. the court rules with the catholic care agency, that was refusing to work with same-sex couples here. this was seen as a big case on questions of religious freedom and discrimination and guy rights. your reaction to the ruling. it s part of the big, political movement. as abby was saying, the struggle against obamacare has lost
involves the health care act. and one weighs into religious freedoms, and specifically whether a catholic foster care agency can refuse to work with same-sex couples. tell us what the justices said, and how they justified their decision in the obamacare case? it will remain in place, and that means millions and millions and millions of people will be able to keep their health care insurance amidst the pandemic. here s what the court did. justice breyer writing for a 7-2 majority, he said the republican states and the individuals that brought the challenge did not have the legal right to be in court because they could not show a concrete harm. you have to step back a little
they didn t agree and they noted this is the third time that this law had been in front of the supreme court, and they said once again the court has come to the improbable rescue of the law but today a big victory for supporters of the affordable care act. a victory for a lot of americans who rely on the affordable care act for their health care and for, you know, protecting the preexisting conditions or if they re, you know, in their early 20s and need to be on health insurance of their parents and so forth. let s pivot to the other court ruling today, that was key, this time, though, the court ruled in favor of a catholic foster care agency that had refused to work with same sex couples. this was obviously a very contentious issue but a unanimous decision here, explain that. right. all of the justices here agreed that philadelphia violated the first amendment when it froze the contract of this catholic foster care agency because the agency wouldn t consider same sex couples as po