william, i think this will be seen as a hugely respectful thing for her to do her majesty. i asked her if i could have a hug and she hugged me back. i m still shaking now. people here are wondering whether or not this was a photo opportunity or whether this is truly the beginning of some kind of a reconciliation process. i m pamela brown in washington. you are in the cnn news room. in great britain tonight, a royal transfer of power. king charles iii is formally named sovereign of the british monarchy. the ancient ceremony, making its own history. this is the first time the british people could turn on their actual tvs and watch the proclamation of their new head of state. and amid that new beginning, a final farewell. the funeral for queen elizabeth ii now announced for a week from monday. and her eldest son, today formally proclaimed as the new king mourns the loss of his mother who he shared with the world. my lords, ladies and gentlemen, it is my most sorrow
transcend or last beyond today s hearing. there s a gap between what we believe is wrong conduct, wrong ways for people and political parties and groups to operate and what is lawful behavior. i m looking for him to make very clear what and how to close that particular gap. for example, that trump tower meeting would be a prime example of how to say what might not be unlawful. but we want to legislate to make sure that it actually is. two things. one, further what we ve been talking about from the first hearing. the second is distinct. but this testimony that s out there and is looming about olc opinion, the reason there s no indictment if, that gets undone or tweaked at all in this next hearing i think that s a big deal. and second, you know, continuing off of what laura said, on a going forward basis, what is the proper conduct the next time someone is trying to arrange a meeting at the trump tower, something like that, by either campaign or any campaign in the future? what is th
contacted the fbi after been contacted by some hoaxter. what is he talking about? i don t have any idea. i think he s talking about something that happened with mr. scliff. i will say that when i have contact from w someone who was reported, first thing i did, of course i contacted the fbi. the republicans are equating christopher steele s work as a former british agent and his effort to help dig up dirt in hillary clinton s campaign saying that she should have contacted the fbi. is there an analogy here? is this analogous? i would say on a going forward basis, if there are foreign agents trying to intervene in our election, there ought to be an affirmative obligation for any presidential campaign to report to the fbi. so you know, i am greatly concerned that we are not doing enough to protect our democracy in 2020. so i think we ought to pass the fire act that would require campaigns to report to the fbi
republican opponents of the president, then hillary clinton s campaign hired. they hired a former british spy. he solicited information from russian officials. that is equal to the russian government and the russian military intelligence interfering in the election in 2016? first of aushlll, the steele report. steele turned the report over to the fbi in the summer of 2016. so this document was turned over. but let s say on a going forward basis, if there was a former foreign agent that was hired, yeah, that ought to be disclosed to the fbi. i m open to again, how do we make this work going forward? we ve got to protect our democracy. the one thing we know is that russia and others will be back. don t take my word for it. take the director of the fbi. trump s own hand-picked director