Them the consequences of their inability to meet the realities of a charge and that their interests, fundamental interests are not wellserved. I also wanted to say that, regarding the sunshine ordinance provisions, those were drafted, i believe, by commissioner herrington when she was chair. I noted in 2013. And i wanted to say that it was a very helpful exercise to try to come to grips with these ethics complaints that were coming to the commission and were basically left in an inbox and not really sufficiently handled by our regses. But it does behoove us now to go back and scrub those regs now that weve had more experience with them. So, this is our second bite of this apple. And i wanted to commend the commission for taking that review up in the context of this overall review of our enforcement regs. Thanks. Thank you. Hi. Good afternoon. Was shocked to hear that your representative spoke and said the Sunshine Ordinance Task force, the only function is that you [inaudible] party. S
Carried for by a disclaimer. If the communication so small it is impracticalable to provide a disclaimer, they are age to just provide a link where you can click and see the disclaimer on another place. That is different, again, than federal law which basically says if its impracticalable, you dont have to do it. State law, again California Law here, going a little bit beyond what federal law does and we believe that is probably sufficient to provide people notice that something is a paid communication. So, were not recommending this as an area for action by you. So, to wrap it up, we would like to hear your thoughts on whether or not this kind of forum regarding archiving idea is something youre interested in having us pursue. If so, whether or not you agree with the rough timeline that we set out here. Thank you. Thank you. I think she pronounces her name ravel, anne ravel. Commissioners . Thank you. So i am very much in support of the proposal that you lay out here. I think this is
But i did want to suggest to the deputy that she might want to review really for the publics interest the item number six on page two of the memo, the staff memo, of what will happen if a person a defendant, essentially, does not reply and goes into denial. That is an unavoidable has been an avoidable, i think, situation that has not been sufficiently addressed until now and i thought it would be useful for the public to walk be walked through to show them the consequences of their inability to meet the realities of a charge and that their interests, fundamental interests are not wellserved. I also wanted to say that, regarding the sunshine ordinance provisions, those were drafted, i believe, by commissioner herrington when she was chair. I noted in 2013. And i wanted to say that it was a very helpful exercise to try to come to grips with these ethics complaints that were coming to the commission and were basically left in an inbox and not really sufficiently handled by our regses. But
Been an avoidable, i think, situation that has not been sufficiently addressed until now and i thought it would be useful for the public to walk be walked through to show them the consequences of their inability to meet the realities of a charge and that their interests, fundamental interests are not wellserved. I also wanted to say that, regarding the sunshine ordinance provisions, those were drafted, i believe, by commissioner herrington when she was chair. I noted in 2013. And i wanted to say that it was a very helpful exercise to try to come to grips with these ethics complaints that were coming to the commission and were basically left in an inbox and not really sufficiently handled by our regses. But it does behoove us now to go back and scrub those regs now that weve had more experience with them. So, this is our second bite of this apple. And i wanted to commend the commission for taking that review up in the context of this overall review of our enforcement regs. Thanks. Thank
Sufficiently addressed until now and i thought it would be useful for the public to walk be walked through to show them the consequences of their inability to meet the realities of a charge and that their interests, fundamental interests are not wellserved. I also wanted to say that, regarding the sunshine ordinance provisions, those were drafted, i believe, by commissioner herrington when she was chair. I noted in 2013. And i wanted to say that it was a very helpful exercise to try to come to grips with these ethics complaints that were coming to the commission and were basically left in an inbox and not really sufficiently handled by our regses. But it does behoove us now to go back and scrub those regs now that weve had more experience with them. So, this is our second bite of this apple. And i wanted to commend the commission for taking that review up in the context of this overall review of our enforcement regs. Thanks. Thank you. Hi. Good afternoon. Was shocked to hear that your