Charge. The truth is in the history of this republic, theres never been a single party fraudulent Impeachment Process deployed against a president like the one thats being used against donald trump. Thats whats unprecedented here. Its not the claim that a president doesnt want to turn over witnesses or documents. That, as weve said many times today, is actually quite common. And by the way, lets remember it needs to be noted again that President Trump has consistently cooperated with this congress in fulfilling its oversight you are listening to one of the many hours of todays very Historic House Judiciary Committee hearing on the articles of impeachment against president donald trump. Our live continuing coverage will take place over this hour and further hours as needed. But we want to let you know how were going to cover this. Were keeping an eye on this hearing. We have reason to believe there could be a vote on the current amendment soon. The committees obviously been going full s
A single party fraudulent Impeachment Process deployed against the president like the one being used against donald trump. Thats whats unprecedented here. Its not the claim that a president doesnt want to turn over witnesses or documents. That as we said many times today is actually quite common. By the way, lets remember, noted again, President Trump has consistently cooperated with this congress in fulfilling its oversight and investigation responsibilities. I noticed the statistics this morning when we started, there were 25 Administration Officials that testified before the House Oversight this year and 25 at the House Judiciary Committee. At the start of the Impeachment Inquiry the white house produced more than 100,000 pages of documents to the oversight committee. In spite of their allegations, the democrats know President Trump has a lawful cause to challenge the subpoenas because they involve direct wln are
communications between high ranking advisors and a president. Thats ve
comment professor turley said in a different hearing. we met the enemy and he is us. with that, i yield back. the gentleman yields back. for what purpose does mr. deutsche seek recognition? move to strike the last word. thank you. there are two articles of impeachment. each is vitally important. obstruction of congress matters to all of us who value the separation of powers in the house and matter to all of us who value the separation of powers in the united states senate. article i vests in the house for sole power of impeachment. that s set forth in the constitution. what has the president done? president trump is the first and only president in american history to openly and indiscriminately defy all aspects of the constitutional impeachment process. october 26th, the president
professor turley said in a different hearing, we ve met the enemy and he is us. and with that, i yield back. gentleman yields back. what purpose does mr. deutsch seek recognition? move to strike last word. recognized. thank you mr. chairman. mr. chairman, there are two articles of impeachment. each is vitally important. obstruction of congress matters to all of us who value the separation of powers here in the house, and it will matter to all of those who value the separation of powers in the united states senate. article one vests in the house the sole power of impeachment. that s set forth in the constitution. so, what has the president done? president trump is the first and only president in american history to openly and indiscriminately defy all aspects of the constitutional impeachment process.
forth in the constitution. they said that the right emanated from some section of the constitution. it s a joke. five years later, the supreme court invented out of that the right to an abortion, out of a right to privacy it s pretty weak stuff. if it were ever really decided on the merits, i don t think it would stand. i also don t think this alabama gambit is going to work, and the reason i think that is you will get to trial court soon and the judge bound by roe vs. wade will strike it down. it will get to an appellate court, and i don t think it will be reversed there. the supreme court will, in my judgment, decline to hear it, and that will be that. i think missouri might be onto something. they might they have some fallback positions that may hold. i don t think these all-out challenges, head-on challenges to roe vs. wade will work right