Looking at large groups of people and not looking at them in any way specifically because they did anything wrong they kept no records. About how often agents were searching for information about u. S. Citizens until last year when congress made them do it and then Court Rulings also so that several searches and february of 20. Apparently involved f. B. I. Efforts to identify americans whom it could try to develop into a potential confidential source of information while. Waiting game by the f. B. I. Was devastating for the absolutely devastating you know sometimes it didnt even stop with them searching like you know. All these americans searching for sources 1 march 2017 search actually more than 70000 identifiers linked to surprise surprise the f. B. I. s all in the workforce identifies with things like email address and things like that in one case and they will use the database to search for information on himself his relatives and other f. B. I. Personnel its like theyre using thi
A long. While. As a sort of gone through the f. B. I. Was searching for information involving large number numbers of americans with no individualized basis for suspicion of any wrongdoing. Meaning they were looking at large groups of people and not looking at them in any way specifically because they did anything wrong they kept no records. About how often agents were searching for information about u. S. Citizens until last year when congress made them do it and then Court Rulings also so that several searches and february of 20. Apparently involved f. B. I. Efforts to identify americans whom it could try to develop and to potential confidential source of information while. Waiting game there by the f. B. I. That it was devastating for the absolutely devastating you know some type it didnt even stop. Searching like you know. All these americans searching for sources 1 march 2017 search actually more than 70000 identifiers linked to surprise surprise the f. B. I. s all in the workforc
Was searching for information involving large number numbers of americans with no individualized basis for suspicion of any wrongdoing. Meaning they were looking at large groups of people and not looking at them in any way specifically because they did anything wrong they kept no records. About how often agents were searching for information about u. S. Citizens until last year when congress made them do it and then Court Rulings also so that several searches and february of 20 teen apparently involved f. B. I. Efforts to identify americans whom it could try to develop and to potential confidential source of information while. Waiting game by the f. B. I. Was devastating for the absolutely devastating you know sometimes it didnt even stop with them searching like you know. All these americans searching for sources 1 march 2017 search actually more than 70000 identifiers linked to surprise surprise the f. B. I. Workforce identifies with things like email address and things like in one c
A blind eye. My friends when your surveillance scandal runs so deep that you can get a wow from Edward Snowden then you know youve reached a pretty obscene new low which is why we must always be watching the hawks. Wonder how to. Treat the press like real with this one. As it were to pull out of. What they like you know what i got. Was that we. Would. Be. Pretty. Well the one watching the entire robot and now thats a long. While. As as sort of gone through the f. B. I. Was searching for information involving large number numbers of americans with no individualized basis for suspicion of any wrongdoing. Meaning they were looking at large groups of people and not looking at them in any way specifically because they did anything wrong they kept no records. About how often agents were searching for information about u. S. Citizens until last year when congress made them do it and then Court Rulings also so that several searches and february of 20. Apparently involved f. B. I. Efforts to id
The chair of the House Intelligence Committee is a possibility thank you very much mike hanna in washington Claire Finkelstein is professor of law and flaws of the at the university of Pennsylvania Law School and joins says on skype from philadelphia great to have you on the program thank you very much now i want to ask just in the grand scheme of things how significant are these allegations and what kind of repercussions could we see from this or is it something thats likely to be swept under the rug as weve seen so many times at the at trumps white house. This is an enormous story possibly the biggest story of this presidency because 1st of all its arguably the 1st time that a whistle blower action has been filed against the president if indeed thats what this action is as we now are coming to understand. And there are extensive protections that are required by law for whistleblowers to enable them to bring Important Information of corruption to light so 2nd of all there would be as