that they under the clean air act congress did not give the epa constitutional authority too implement regulations on states to reduce the carbonns dioxide pollution by moving away from coal fired carbon plants to other forms of energy. what the left wants is forhe the epa to do all the work to get us from coal to g green energy and in the supreme court said no, they don t have that regulatory power. this is something that congressf has to decide. and the amazing part of all of this is they re saying that it s damaging our ability to keep clean air. isn t. just like the clean air act wasn an act of congress passed another act. this iss a democracy.. well, i ll tell you this. ifou you re a small business b owner,us it produces anything you can do a little fist pump. but l this because no government agency reaches too far into people s pockets than the epa. they have supreme authorityey until they don t now they don t they ?
really saying is we don t w want climate change addressed to. yeah, you vee got to hear from you in there, judge. dg i want to go to you first on something a little bit more serious than that highlight reel of hypocrisy. igh did the supreme court overreach in its power or is it being incrediblyly consistent in tryig to get as much opportunity back to the states possible? you what amazes me is all the comments that were made, roe orabt s about j whether it s about the epa and this decision, they basically are turning everythingng back to congress and to the people. t and yet the democrats arede saying, you know,mo this is fraudulent, this is t wrong, this is reactionary, they re wrong. basically what the united states supreme court is saying, whether it s roe or whether it s in this epa case, which was a six to three case. yeah, i mean, john roberts is on the case as well. l, and all t they re saying is the epa lacks broad statutory authority to curb greenhouse g gas emissions from
but this decision like the gunon decision yesterday, simply o follows the plain language of the constitution. remember, the second amendment t clearly provides forhe the righn to keep and bear arms and the left feel like no, it doesn t. meanwhile,an the constitution says nothing about abortion, but the left claims it is a constitutional right. constitutional rights can t be made up out of whole cloth. it s ludicrous, but that sst what the court stupidly did in roe. the left cites the need for a living constitution. i love that talk about twisted a logic where a document must live and be protected forhi living while a preborn human being must have no right to life at all. very logical. now the as much as the establishment of big business media, they work to silence and demoralize the pro-life movementine. alll these years it didn t work. the pro-life movement was not left behind. it didn t fade away.
0 to people and they say they took away our right to abortion. you can tell them the truth. that s not what today s decision did. they decided who gets to decide and the constitution is clear . it s the states all the time we have left this evening. thanks for being with us. thank you for making the show possible. stay with the fox news channel for continuing coverage, not your heartbeat troubled laura s next . we ll see on monday. i m laura ingram and this is ingraham angle on a triumphant friday night from new york answered prayers. that s the focus of tonight s angle on january 22nd . nineteen seventy three almost fifty years ago, seven members of the supreme held that under the fourteenth amendment of our constitution the same constitute that americans and fought and died to protect elected officials could not protect the unborn from abortion. now ever since that time,l abortion has been a constitutional right now this is a painful and humiliating experience forov tens of million
on the border. amazing story. thank you .. ifwh you think about it, what ae the two great crises of the last 20 years? the two things the u.s. government spent more time and money on than anything else and those of course,te would be terrorism and covid. so if you want toan fight terrorism, you probably should keep track of who s coming into your country and just not let millions of random people whosee identities you can t confirm come and stay. who are these people? we don t know. o here s one thing we know one of the peopleg who s been let into this country by the biden administration, according to a brand new blockbuster story in dublin, detroit is on the terror watchet. his name is sam bozie. he s from venezuela. gittings reportedly on the fbiat terror watch list forch affiliation with some unspecified terror group. he s nowon wie awaiting an asylm hearing in detroit. forhe further details this week, we want to go to the man who broke the story. charlie leduff won a pulitzer prize