their own foreign policy position papers, but romney is unusual in that he seems not to have even read his. according to a clarifications from romney s campaign, he apparently would order a military strike before iran even acquired a bomb simply when it was getting close. for anyone who has actually seen a battlefield, that s a blithe, too-light embrace of a path to yet another war. it s emblematic of a candidate who, on foreign policy, appears an empty shell. andrea mitchell, does he need to replace his team? what does he need to do to sort of turn the tide? there were a number of articles like this over the weekend of pieces. this is on mitt romney, what i find really inexplicable is that he did not accurately explain the view on iran and israel that he himself had previously articulated and that all of his advisers were laying out. so he aligned himself with president obama s view on the red lines against iran, not netanyahu s. and that makes absolutely no