insurrectionists. help me understand this, what is that decision like for public speaker, public figures, whether they should speak up about this or not? you know, it is incredibly difficult to sort out the right response to this. because, the truth of the matter is, we got the intake of experience for multiple families across the country, there was a true coordinated, subculture online, of people that do these kinds of things, phoning in the fake 9-1-1 calls for fun. they pick someone, seemingly at random oftentimes, and decide to make their lives hole. the more that people decide to speak up about it, the more that they become victims, as well. you mentioned the kansas case, where a man got 20 years for having done this. that s an unusual thing. by and large, the people who do swatting get away with it, because the law has not caught up with this. that s why public officials may feel that they don t want to speak up, because they are worried about drawing the attention of the onlin
sometimes a jargon them out of bed in the middle of the night, with no clothes on, pointing guns at them. the sensation for the victims is very much one of not just total boulder meant by absolute terror, as you try to explain to armed police officers that you had been convinced that you are in there doing something terrible, or some life and death situation is in the house. you re trying to convince them not to kill you. it s a terrible, terrible thing. becomes more horrible. it s at the perfect piece of civil sabotage. because, police, as we have learned in the space of law enforcement across the country is really legally responsible as showing up at any presumed emergency, ready for the emergency phone in. there is not an option of not coming or saying, as a result, not showing up. you have to show up in some form. police officers across the country have been told that we are not trained for this yet. there is no national system for letting people know, this is a
you know, that manufacturing has disappeared, and there is a lot of rage in flyover country. that really explains support for trump, i believe. did that explain the support for trump back in 2016? he saw that rage, was wise enough to go to those towns to speak to those people. however, over the course of those four years, he did not pass any policies, they not do anything that helped those voters. in fact, when he lost and joe biden won, we are actually seeing manufacturing come back. we re seeing massive infrastructure investment. what is it beyond the fact that trump does a good story and gets those people to feel scene and fired up, he does not have the facts on his side, when are those voters going to see that? he has not delivered for them. he delivered for corporate america and wall street, did
organization here in storm lake that you might see elsewhere in rural iowa. we know what matters to evangelicals. , we know what trump has their support, but what are the other issues that motivate iowa voters? i think what the real issue is motivating voters is not only in iowa, but ohio, wisconsin, generally the midwest, is 50 years of consolidation and decline in both manufacturing and agriculture and rural communities sliding off the map, and places like plymouth and davenport that used to be major manufacturing centers. you know, that manufacturing has disappeared, and there is a lot of rage in flyover country.
appointee, posing stark hypotheticals on what a future president could do if mr. trump s view prevailed. can the president order seal team six to assassinated political rival? the answer, in sauer s view, is rest, as long as the president wasn t indicted impeached first. a position doj cast as frightening. what kind of world are we living in? the president has the unique constitutional role, but he is not above the law. so that s what went down in court. it was not a lot of space or time for political theater, so donald trump save that for after the hearing, and when it was all over he and his lawyers went to the d.c. waldorf astoria to give their version of the day and predict what will happen if they lose this case. there will be bedlam in the country. it s a very bad thing. it s a very bad president. we can see the opening of a