is mischaracterizing what we ve argued for at masterpiece and the court decided. it isn t about denying service to anyone. the only cases being litigated here are to force people to participate in custom work, handmade, hand tailored, one-of-a-kind work and to express a message or celebrate a religious ceremony. this isn t about denying service. barronelle serves everyone and welcomes all people into her shop as she served rob for 10 years knowing that he was gay. sandra: kristin, thank you. barronelle thank you for telling your story and you are a business owner and as you just told us, you are still actively in your business today and we ll continue to watch it as it heads to the lower courts. thank you for coming on the program this morning. thank you. thank you. sandra: a police dog in spain showing off his first responder skills in a video that has gone viral. look at mon choh. he is going up and down because
this ban was something he promised politically. i think he felt it was following through on a campaign promise and that s why you saw them out of the gate try the first attempt very quickly which was so haphazardly done it was proven quickly unconstitutional. i think there are ways to handle the terrorist threat under existing immigration laws that you don t need this type of ban for. sandra: is shannon standing by? i think it s important to get this in here how careful chief justice roberts was not to endorse either trump s statements that caitlin just mentioned about immigration in general, and muslims in particular. he said quote we express no view on the soundness of the policy, roberts wrote. he talks about that and says the plaintiffs are constantly referring to the fact the president s words strike at fundamental standards of respect and tolerance but the issue before us is not whether
well, that might depend on who the media is these days, right? i would hope the american people sooner rather than later find out what has taken place and what this man and several others like him were all about. and the question comes in when it comes to the russian investigation is why was it launched to begin with? i hope we get an answer to that. that goes back to the informants and everything else and all the information we want to know about that. eric: quickly, do you suspect that the informants were sent out there to sick on president trump for political reasons or because there was sincere worry and concern there could have been russian influence? i think they should have to prove one way or other which way it was. eric: we ll find out what mr. strzok perhaps says tomorrow as we await his explanations. thank you, congressman. sandra: president trump calling out harley davidson again this morning after the american company announces a plan to move some production over
his powers. at first reading it looks like it is a big win for the administration on the travel ban but looks like further court action will take place now. it is sent back to the lower court with strong guidance and very strong statements from the supreme court. sandra: the president has said he has acted in accordance with the law and his executive power to protect national security in all of this. to recap if you could, shannon. we ll open it up to our a-team panel, the president is receiving a limited sort of endorsement of this executive authority. the supreme court upholding the selective travel restrictions into the u.s. this is one that critics have labeled a muslim ban. the ruling is 5-4, shannon. it is. what they do is point to the immigration law that gives the president this power. there was discussion during the arguments the last case they heard in april about if you don t like the law, maybe congress should rewrite it.
together and lead the democrats who want open borders and unlimited crime well into the future and pick crooked hillary for president. the president still talking a lot about hillary clinton even though the election is almost two years ago. here is what happens, eric. if the immigration bill does not pass in the house or if it passes in the house and doesn t pass in the senate, everybody is back to square one. the only thing out there is the executive order the president signed the other day subject to a pending ruling from a judge, the california district court and central district of california. so the only other option may be for congress and the president to consider a stand alone measure to keep these families together. if this bill does not pass in the house either tomorrow or sometime before the end of the week, the president s options will be very limited. eric: a busy week. thanks so much. sandra: the red hen restaurant in virginia that refused to serve white house press s