Presenting. Corey representing the Planning Department. Kevin birmingham, acting chief building inspector with department of building inspection. The board request you turn off or silens phones and Electronic Device said to not disturb proceedings. No eating or drinking thin hearing room. The boards rules appellate s permit holders and respondents are given 7 minutes for their case and 4 minutes of rebuttal. Must include the comments. Members not affiliated have up to 3 minutes each and no rebuttal. Time may be limited to 2 mntss if the agenda is long or large number of speakers. You will have a verbal warning 30 seconds before the time is up. Four votes are needed to grant appeal. The board rules or hearing schedules email board staff at boardofappeals sfgov. Or g. Sfgovtv iscasting and streaming live and have the ability to receive Public Comment. Sfgovtv is providing closed captioning for the meeting. Go to sfgovtv. A link to the live stream is found on the home page at sfgov. Org.
Exceptions that makes the the denial of the permit by planning there are two other exceptions. One would be they wait a year, and two is that they resubmit a revised project. Right. Besides the fact that the Planning Commission excuse me, the board of appeals can review that particular permit, should it be appealed. That is correct. The Property Owners have the option right now with the existing Building Permit, which as mentioned has not yet been forally denied by the Planning Department or by the department of building inspection, and the reason is because they have options with what they can do with that permit, and they are basically going through the process to help determine how they want to explore those options. One of the options they would have is to amend that permit in a way that would amend it so significantly that it would be considered perthe charter, a different project. If they did not want to do that, they would have to wait if the project was effectively and ultimate
Good evening again president honda, commissioners, cory teague from Planning Department staff. Id like to begin with some Procedural Department background. The subject property at 2523 steiner street is located within the rh 1 Zoning District and a 40 x height and bulk district. The proposal is to expand the existing third and fourth story of the existing singlefamily home into the required rear yard. Based on the design feedback from the Planning Departments residential Design Planning team, the Planning Department revised such that the planned structure encroached into the rear yard approximately 93 into the ground floor. The proposed addition variance was heard at a joint hearing with the Planning Commission on june 15, 2017 where they also held a hearing for discretionary review. So summarize the comments, the acting Zoning Administrator stating that can be challenging to make a required finding that the project would not be injurous to the project in the vicinity however the subje
The denial of the permit by planning there are two other exceptions. One would be they wait a year, and two is that they resubmit a revised project. Right. Besides the fact that the Planning Commission excuse me, the board of appeals can review that particular permit, should it be appealed. That is correct. The Property Owners have the option right now with the existing Building Permit, which as mentioned has not yet been forally denied by the Planning Department or by the department of building inspection, and the reason is because they have options with what they can do with that permit, and they are basically going through the process to help determine how they want to explore those options. One of the options they would have is to amend that permit in a way that would amend it so significantly that it would be considered perthe charter, a different project. If they did not want to do that, they would have to wait if the project was effectively and ultimately disapproved, they would
The appellant it was agreed that there was some inconsistencies particularly heights and some which dont really relate to the conditions of approval but other rendering were generally accurate with the conditions of approval. Due to time limitations i will conclude my presentation there and present for information at rebuttal. Mr. Teague. Yeah. I think there were two other exceptions that makes the the denial of the permit by planning there are two other exceptions. One would be they wait a year, and two is that they resubmit a revised project. Right. Besides the fact that the Planning Commission excuse me, the board of appeals can review that particular permit, should it be appealed. That is correct. The Property Owners have the option right now with the existing Building Permit, which as mentioned has not yet been forally denied by the Planning Department or by the department of building inspection, and the reason is because they have options with what they can do with that permit, a