they don t feel comfortable with. what this executive order would do would be to take money, existing money within the federal budget. our reporting has shown it would probably take money from military construction projects. it could take money from disaster relief, particularly disaster relief for california and puerto rico, to blue states. it would also potentially have some flood dam projects in california. that s really the pockets of money that the white house is eyeing. i would like to say not just, you know, along with what elliot said, it wouldn t just immediately cause litigation and legal challenges, i think there would be a real outcry in congress as well because each of these districts and military housing, you know, there s a constituency behind it that s in some lawmaker s backyard. so there will be an outcry among republican lawmakers, too. just the property claims, the eminent domain claims, people
probably take money from military construction projects. it could take money from disaster relief, particularly disaster relief for california and puerto rico, to blue states. it would also potentially have some flood dam projects in california. that s really the pockets of money that the white house is eyeing. i would like to say not just, you know, along with what elliot said, it wouldn t just immediately cause litigation and legal challenges, i think there would be a real outcry in congress as well because each of these districts and military housing, you know, there s a constituency behind it that s in some lawmaker s backyard. so there will be an outcry among republican lawmakers, too. just the property claims, the eminent domain claims, people haven t begun to discuss that. i want to play for you, robert, part of what the president said. this is a false narrative to the hometown crowd, where the story is false about the wall and crime rate stats in el paso.
an executive order, and we ve seen the president use that executive authority a lot, but it wouldn t go as far as declaring a national emergency, which conservatives have expressed discomfort with, saying it would set a precedent they don t feel comfortable with. what this executive order would do would be to take money, existing money within the federal budget. our reporting has shown it would probably take money from military construction projects. it could take money from disaster relief, particularly disaster relief for california and puerto rico, to blue states. it would also potentially have some flood dam projects in california. that s really the pockets of money that the white house is eyeing. i would like to say not just, you know, along with what elliot said, it wouldn t just immediately cause litigation and legal challenges, i think there would be a real outcry in congress as well because each of these districts and military housing, you know, there s a