investigation? oh, it was fair. i think he put the best face he could on it. i agree with jeffrey lourd had hi done this lack in january it would have been more acceptable. i think what we now have, the central point now, erin, we ve had an astonishing 48 hours in which the president of the united states has reached in and fired the investigator who is investigating the white house. the white house comes out with a story about it that they tell the world, the vice president tells the world, they tell the congress, they tell the country, here s what here s why we did it. it has nothing to do with the russians. it has everything to do with the e-mails and we did it because the deputy attorney general at the justice department came with the recommendation supported by the attorney general. it turns out the whole story has unraveled throughout the last 48 hours. it s not just contradictions but they re lies. i don t think we ve seen anything quite so brazen in a long time. i can t reme
publicly. if you think about all of those clips that you just showed where they re praising michael flynn. what has changed since then is flynn has entered a guilty plea because of mueller s investigation. since then, it s even changed a little bit publicly. i m thinking back to the vice president pence interview with cbs where he started to say, well, flynn lied to me, flynn did this. they re already painting him as a liar, because they want to discredit anything that he could say in this investigation to say, look, we couldn t trust him then how could anyone trust him now. not that they think this will play out necessarily in their favor in federal court, what they re saying publicly shouldn t influence a jury. but it could influence the way congress and the public see michael flynn and anything that he may provide. danny cevallos, let me ask you about the piece this morning. impugning or questioning what michael flynn may or anyway not say.