and he talked about and i did not expect this from the governor. i thought this would come from the other foreign policy hands on the stage. but governor bergen did talk about how that feels in afghanistan were in the two-year anniversary right now. i think is on sunday. the anniversary. 13 men and women who died in that disastrous chaotic withdrawal in afghanistan and governor burgum mentioned that as one of the reasons why putin invaded and so gop candidates need to remind the american people this is biden s filipek this is his mess that we are having to clean up. trace: and rebeccah, your thoughts because morgan brings up a good plays. we would have liked more foreign policy talk. what would you have liked to have been covered in that de debate. i would like more fleshing out this concept of the united states being in a cold war with china. there was only i think it was governor burgum who mentioned that and phrased it that way and i think that that is the phraseology that needs
hello, wes. hello. there are loads of things we can ask about this. the health mission, first of all, when will you be fleshing that out, as we only got flesh on the bones of one mission today. yeah, in the coming months, keir s going to do a big speech. i ve already given quite a bit of direction of travel on health and social care reform. the first part of the mission, there is a whole agenda about life sciences and medical technology, which has enormous potential both to improve productivity in the nhs and also to revolutionise the way we do medicine in this country, so we can notjust diagnose and treat earlier, but potentially predict and prevent, which is just revolutionary in terms of genomics and data. and the final thing, which i would argue is the hardest bit and probably a generational challenge, is to close health inequalities in our country, because if you are serious about that, that s notjust a mission for the nhs or even the department of health, that s about tackling po
so a lot is about the meetings he would have as prime minister and how they d be different from the meetings rishi sunak has. i suppose he is trying to set the parameters as he would like them to be set in the run up to the next election. these are the areas he wants to fight the next election on. yeah, but it would be good to put more flesh on these bones, and we can do that now as we are joined by shadow health secretary wes streeting. hello, wes. hello. there are loads of things we can ask about this. the health mission, first of all, when will you be fleshing that out, as we only got flesh on the bones of one mission today. yeah, in the coming months, keir s going to do a big speech. i ve already given quite a bit of direction of travel on health and social care reform. the first part of the mission, there is a whole agenda about life sciences and medical technology, which has enormous potential both to improve productivity in the nhs and also to revolutionise the way we do medicin
hours, it was over the carolinas, and that s when they took the decision to close the airspace and shut down the airspace, and then they carried out this mission. us fighter aircraft took down the balloon. the other interesting thing that sticks out is the threat that they perceive from the prc. the language they decided to use, an unacceptable violation of our sovereignty, is how they finished it and they said this national security team of president biden will always put the safety and security of the american people first while responding effectively to the prc s unacceptable violation of our sovereignty. that statement basically coming through for fleshing out some of the detail. now
world. he never gave any indication that it was, the actual financials that it was coming from trump world until he said it that night. i don t know what people s standards were for what they thought was going to be interesting potentially in the final report versus what we already know and from the executive summary, but a lot of the stuff in this hutchinson transcript is not just explosive but and in fleshing out the story in very vivid and powerful ways, but also i think has potential legal implications for a bunch of people. what do you think? yes, definitely for some of the people. i think you see basically a spectrum of obstruction, some of which may be criminally actionable and some which may not be. so you had many witnesses stonewalling, taking the fifth amendment. that s their right. it definitely suggests some consciousness of guilt or wanting to conceal something, but that s not actionable, and