through whatever its ultimate course is going to be, whether that is a possible plea or in front of a jury or a whole host of options. so this is just the beginning. and again, i think that the next big step is to see what, if anything, the judges do with this motion. whether the da responds and in particular, whether they re indictments, who is named and what types of charges we might see in that. when he s fleming, thanks very much for joining us on this very first trump filing in the georgia case. thank you very much for joining us tonight. thanks for having me. coming up, today, trump lawyer evan corcoran was seen entering the courthouse in washington d.c. were special prosecutor. meets on friday. evan corcoran was ordered to testify to that grand jury by the federal judge overseeing the case. what does this mean
yet to be seen. i think we anticipated that there would be a flurry of motions after an indictment, if one is coming we are still waiting for that, obviously. so to get a motion like this, which is effectively a motion to dismiss, a motion to recuse, prior to indictment, is somewhat out of the norm certainly in my experience, i haven t seen one filed with this timing. but we expect a very robust motions practice will which will cause delays and things for the case to get through whatever its ultimate course is going to be, whether that is a possible plea or in front of a jury or a whole host of options. so this is just the beginning. and again, i think that the next big step is to see what, if anything, the judges do with this motion. whether the da responds and in particular, whether they re indictments, who is named and what types of charges we might see in that. when he s fleming, thanks
we may not survive next. fleming, i know that in courtrooms with trial juries who we can see, whenever we se a motion, which is rare. it is a very rare thing to see any emotion injures. every once in a while you se some of it you sometimes very rarely se crying in jurors and peopl immediately interpret about it and just rather easy in trials to interpret what that means where is those tears are sympathy of which side, this tends to be rather clear what do you make of what you are reading about the emotions that these jurors went through that you have a juror out in a car crying after hearing the testimony about how lives were ruined, individual lives wer ruined by the lies that were told well again, i can t imagine
to do that again he will get better at it and h will be more persistent, mor determined, more desperate, an we may not survive next. fleming, i know that in courtrooms with trial juries who we can see, whenever we se a motion, which is rare. it is a very rare thing to see any emotion injures. every once in a while you se some of it you sometimes very rarely se crying in jurors and peopl immediately interpret about it and just rather easy in trials to interpret what that means where is those teas sympathy of which side of this tends to be rather clear what do you make of what you are reading about the emotions that these jurors went through that you have a juror out in a car crying after hearing the testimony about how lives were ruined, individual lives wer ruined by the lies that were