reassuring churchill day after day, week after week that the french were putting up a brave defense had they knew the war was already lost, please, slowly repeat what you just said and hopefully conservatives will go back and look at what commentators and websites said over the past three weeks when they knew this race was lost. they have i ll say it again in exactly the same words. the conservative followership has been exploited, fleeced and lied to by the entertainment complex. name names. because of that i name names in the book. i don t think that s even necessary. and there are too many to name. but because the followers, the donors and the activists are so mistaken about the nature of the problems the country faces, the nature i mean, just a simple question. i went to tea party rallies. and i would ask this question. have taxes gone up or down in the past four years? they could not answer that question correctly.
this is an individual who s running as a fiscal conservative, but the fact is he voted eight times to raise the debt ceiling in washington, d.c., earmarks, he s an earmark king, if you will. i mean, whether it was the montana sheep institute or the teapot museum in one of the carolinas or whether it was a rain forest in iowa, he voted for all of these spending bills. and we know what the deal is. listen, if you ll help me out on my spending bill, i ll help you out on mine. and it s i ll scratch your back, you scratch mine, and the american people are the ones that end up getting fleeced. so, please, don t tell me what a great fiscal conservative you are when your record doesn t hold up to that type of scrutiny in washington d.c. and americans understand that is problem number one, is the spending. and we ve got to get it under control. and so the insiders that have been up in d.c. for all these years, if we expect them to fix what s broken, no, because they re the ones that broke it. m
this is an individual who s running as a fiscal conservative, but the fact is he voted eight times to raise the debt ceiling in washington, d.c., earmarks, he s an earmark king, if you will. i mean, whether it was the montana sheep institute or the teapot museum in one of the carolinas or whether it was a rain forest in iowa, he voted for all of these spending bills. and we know what the deal is. listen, if you ll help me out on my spending bill, i ll help you out on mine. and it s i ll scratch your back, you scratch mine, and the american people are the ones that end up getting fleeced. so, please, don t tell me what a great fiscal conservative you are when your record doesn t hold up to that type of scrutiny in washington d.c. and americans understand that is problem number one, is the spending. and we ve got to get it under control. and so the insiders that have been up in d.c. for all these years, if we expect them to fix what s broken, no, because they re the ones that broke it.
it s time to come together help small business grow, be energy independent and stop unfair trade with china. that was a big issue last night. first time. you feel we are in a trade war with china but we are letting them win and get away with it. what were other people that stood out last night in watching your opponents? that s a tough question for me. i call it tweedle dee and tweedle dumb. but these are politicians and corporate executives. i think the answer is with the people. listen to occupy wall street. you know what they re saying? no one went to jail on wall street after billions were fleeced, trillions were taken from the taxpayers. documents of mortgages were proven to be illegal. the rating agencies were paid off by the wall street banks. they got bailed out. they eliminated glass stiegel,
two years and a couple of days after you first got the news that you had been fleeced of money that you had invested with him for years. how do you feel today? good afternoon. we re gratified that the trustee had the settlement, suing up to $80 billion, but what doesn t give what the press does not cover is the fact that there are hundreds of innocent parties who are old, impoverished, can t afford lawyers who are terrified currently getting sued by the trustee, and this is not fair. the fact of the matter is that the trustee has now recovered or will shortly about $9 billion from various parties and the allowed claims are only $6 billion. so what s happening to the other $3 billion? is it really necessary to sue people in this particular case who can t afford to pay any money in just because they re innocent victims and their own particular situations led to this? we should clarify this for