white house. so many people want to come n i have a choice of anybody. i could take any position in the white house and i ll have a choice of the 10 top people having to do with that position. everybody wants to be there. and they love this white house because we have energy like rarely before. thank you very much. thank you sir. mr. prime minister last year you criticized the president for drawing a link between immigrant crime and the recent arrivals of refugees. this week one of our own flagship papers, the new york times, profiled a link between hand grenade violence and immigrant gang violence in your country. do you stand by your criticism the president? sweden, we have our share of domestic challenges no, doubt about that. so we inherited a wlegttion that was not sustainable, legislate ocean migration. legislation on migration. in 2015, we received 163,000
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20180306:21:01:00
comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
is your explanation, i put it to you an inference could be drawn if the larger settlements contained confidentiality and the smaller did not, despite what you say it being a pragmatic condition based on the cost of the company an inference could be bought that silence was being bought by the confidentiality clause in the larger settlements. that inference would be false. a lot of people find it quite hard to believe that two executives who nobody would regard as passive had such little knowledge of widespread illegality at one of your flagship papers. can i ask you very specifically, mr. james murdoch first, when did you become aware that the victims of crime had been hacked, when did you become aware that the phone of the murder victim dowler had been
contained confidentiality clauses and the smaller settlements did not, that despite what you say about it being a pragmatic decision being based on the cost of the company an ince inference could be drawn that silence was being bought by the confidentiality clause in the larger settlements. ? that inference would be false. okay, fair enough. many people would find it quite hard to believe that two executives that nobody would regard as passive had such little knowledge of widespread illegality at one of your flagship papers. can i ask you very specifically, mr. james murdoch, first, when did you become aware that the phones of members of the celebrities and royal families and members of crime had been hacked. when did you become aware that the phone of the murder victim had been hacked? the terrible instance of
litigation costs would have been had the company taken the litigation to its end and lost. yes, you ve been very clear about that. that is your explanation for the size of the settlement. i m really putting it to you that no ince inference could be drawn if the larger settlements contained confidentiality clauses and the smaller settlements did not, that despite what you say about it being a pragmatic decision being based on the cost of the company an ince inference could be drawn that silence was being bought by the confidentiality clause in the larger settlements. ? that inference would be false. okay, fair enough. many people would find it quite hard to believe that two executives that nobody would regard as passive had such little knowledge of widespread illegality at one of your flagship papers. can i ask you very specifically, mr. james murdoch, first, when did you become aware that the phones of members of the
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.