In an investigation that implicates either me or my campaign because youre my Attorney General. Its my Justice Department and whats more, you can be a hero to conservatives if youll investigate my vanquished rival. When we meet with parliamentarians from emerging democracies we always urge them when you win an election, you dote seek to jail the losing side. Here our own president of the United States is trying to do exactly that. How big a deal is it fundamentally . Well, its a big deal in this respect. Its further evidence of a corrupt intent on the president s part. Further evidence that he may have violated the law by obstructing justice in the firing of comey. But in other efforts, as well. One of the other disturbing signs we saw just today is the president s announcement that hes going to pardon someone who had violated Campaign Finance laws by surreptitiously exceeding limits. It looks a lot like a message to Michael Cohen who may also be
implicated in exceeding Campaign Limits
he wants to have is a fixer ala michael cohen. he acts yes, you could say a dictator, yes in a third world country or you could say a mob boss. i ve never seen anything like it, and it continues to play out day by day. there s this tweet to the senator s point, jake, about the role of the attorney general, joe digenova, briefly considered to be as the president s lawyer. he s on cable news a lot. he said the recusal of sessions was and you forced betrayal of the president of the united states and the president tweeting back clearly as an endorsement. recusal in the guidelines of the doj ethics office. what do you make of that. you have to follow the logic train. senator laid it out very well. the logic train is jeff sessions let the president down because he didn t maintain control of the russia investigation and cut it off. and close out the russia investigation. so basically, what the president and dijen nova and all of his allies are saying is, jeff sessions made an error here b
twisting the ample his attorney general? no, i ve never seen it. i started my career whether he ronald reagan was president. i left after barack obama finished his second term. not one of them ever tried to use the attorney general as a fixer. all you need to do is just go back and look at what the job of the attorney general is. it was stated in 1789. and it s been the same ever since. the attorney general, that s the people s lawyer. not the president s lawyer. and this is using, this is what he wants to have is a fixer ala michael cohen. he acts yes, you could say a dictator, yes in a third world country or you could say a mob boss. i ve never seen anything like it, and it continues to play out day by day. there s this tweet to the senator s point, jake, about the role of the attorney general,