false stories that were out there. david axelrod, final word to you, when you look especially as a former top adviser to a president, you look at where we are here, look at michael flynn being in some hot water although he could be in hotter water and now you see fingers pointed and clear warnings being made from the mueller investigation toward other people in president trump s inner circle, where do you see this going from here? it look, i think if i were sitting in the white house for all of their brabravado, if i w sitting in the white house tonight, i would be deeply, deeply disturbed. everything about this document suggests that this investigation is headed up and now they ve got a guy who was deeply embedded in both the campaign and the white you know, the transition, certainly, and was very close to the operation and very close to these matters, you know, to russia and these matters that are under review.
that is one idea. that is an idea we have suggested how to pay for it look, as president trump acknowledged to us when i method with republican senators the other day, in this bill have you got about 70% of the relief that s going to corporations, about 30% that s going to individuals. and we think that this is one way of making sure individuals get more relief. there are other ways you could pay for it we are agnostic as to what the pay fors ought to be: we want to make sure that america s moms and dads get this benefit and that they are relieved from some of this tax burden. steve: senator, a lot of people are looking in this morning and they are thinking they could be on the verge of actually passing this or they could be on the verge of another disaster like they had with the affordable care act. no. we re going to pass this. look, i m very bullish on this. i think most basically all of my republican colleagues in the senate are very bullish. we re going to get this thing pas
all stood by him. it took molesting a child to get some people to walk away from that. no wonder people this is the the party that is racist, ignorants, doesn t care about gun violence, minorities or people dying. this party has moved away from the quote, unquote, moral fiber they used to prop themselves up on that show it s really was just for show and not something they believed in. they ve been quite successful electorally. yes and no. yes and no. the republican party looks very sf successful right now. it look likes the best year since 1928. the last time the republicans were this dominant back in the 1920s, they were dominant in the m major cultural centers of the united states.
women get married, for example, or whatever. i want to call you whatever you want to be called. that s my view because i m trying to be polite. that s different from the state weighing in and saying if you somehow use the wrong name more than once or t several times or in a way that we consider, quote, persistent, we are going to w punish you more severely than we would if you knowingly gave someone a fatal disease. what the hell? well, so, we have a couple of different issues there. first off, h.i.v. is no longer the fatal disease. when you and i were going living through the 80s and seeing people dying left and right in san francisco, among other places, it was fatal. and now medicine hasn advanced that it s not fatal anymore. we are keeping people alive. t look at magic johnson. tucker: that is true. but if you know people who have h.i.v., i m sure you do i do. i do. tucker: first of all, people do die from it for sure. it s a huge deal, it s a big deal. it makes you real
being nominated for a position at omb. the question was asked based on what he believes about the prerequisites for obtaining eternal salvation. why this is ever a relevant consideration. why that s ever an acceptable question is beyond my ability to understand. yet this colleague also called out that nominee and said he couldn t vote for that nominee.ag that s troubling. tucker: people ask how could evangelicals voted for donald trump? maybe this is why. i can t resist and i didn t tell you i was going to ask this. i can t control myself. you are chairing the subcommittee on antitrust in the senate. do you think there will ever be a move against google for what appear to be antitrust violations? t look, any time there is a violation of antitrust law, i think you will see a move to correct that antitrust remedy. one of the many things that t we see in the digital age is the emergence of certain things that people find troubling. they don t always fit neatly within the the structu