earlier and talked about the it letter from the white house. it s just garbage. it s one of the worst letters i ve seen from the white house counsel s office and they make very good arguments. i mean this was trash. basically the thrust of it is that there is some kind of constitutional obligations the house has failed to meet that therefore render its impeachment inquiry illegitimate and unconstitutional which is complete nonsense because all the kaungsitution says is that the house has the sole power of impeachment. it completely vests the power of impeachment in the house and the house gets to decide how to go about doing that. he calls the letter garbage. it s certainly been called more political than legal but garbage. would you agree with that? i almost think george is being too kind.
was it letter eight ricky martin, was it b the boom boom boys, or c, los del rio? see, los del rio. tucker: i don t think that can be right but let s check. tucker: that turns out to be right. did you remember, it s a good song, i remember making fun of it at the time but i don t remember why we made fun of it but it s kind of awesome. final question. this is sudden-death, just one
they have hired the iconic actor to be its very first celebrity voice for alexa. tucker: i m impressed. what about the law? isn t he supposed to announce for the question that was multiple-choice. tucker: that was multiple-choice, i announce multiple-choice and that s how i aced the s.a.t. and got into harvard, pure guessing. it s underrated. i went to trinity. question 3. fantastic news out of england, there will be another royal wedding, can you keep track of all that? is it letter, princess eugenie, b, princess beatrice, or c, somebody called lady janet? b, princess beatrice.
ukranian gas company. the president said no quid pro quo. it was a beautiful letter. he was confused himself over the details. the democrats are meeting this afternoon. they could move forward soon with impeachment or at least inch toward impeachment. the president earlier called that ridiculous. he said, never a quid pro quo. it was a beautiful he called it letter there, but it was a conversation. he also said the hesitation, the reason he withheld aid, he made a decision to withhold aid just before that phone call. if you re suspicious, you connect the dots. the president said, no, i wanted them. i was waiting for other countries to help us with military aid. the administration for days has said the issue was corruption, not military aid. so he now seems to be saying these are two completely different things that happened to occur at the same time. on the one hand, why aren t other countries paying, other countries should pay, and on the other hand, concerns about joe biden not c
has the blame shifted? three weeks ago the feeling was generally that the president owned it letter said that to chuck schumer and nancy pelosi. it seemed as though americans were bramilaming him. and then he capitulate and gave them three more weeks to come up with some sort of funding. this time around has the calculus changed and will democrats be to blame? i think a bit. i don t know that it fundamentally will. i think the president will still bear the brunt of blame. especially when the president you can tell a lot when the president goes down to the border and does some big over-the-top rally where he s just arguing a case likely with falsehoods instead of being very particular about what border agents needs, what s really needed. both sides need to be in a position where they can strike a deal and tell their base it was worth compromising on this because we got something bigger. so the issue of i.c.e. and the beds, this is a base issue on the left.