asking about was deeply dist disturbing. we had an individual wearing a tactic call vest and gun and nail gun who tried to attack the cincinnati field office. a subsequent review of the subject s devices and online postings identified a pretty striking anti-f.b.i., anti-federal law enforcement hostility. he was calling on others to kill federal law enforcement claiming he felt he was fighting in his words a civil war. it is unfortunately part of a broader phenomenon that we have seen not just against the f.b.i. this is important to add, but against law enforcement all across the country. not just against law enforcement professionals themselves, which is appalling enough, but calling for attacks against their families, which is truly despicable. that man was captured and eliminated, was he not? yes. a few days later was the arizona f.b.i. department subject of armed violence armed protestors? well, i know that our phoenix field office has had a number of very concer
Sitting president of the United States. Another mark up hearing tomorrow morning which is expected. The imminent impeachment on the house floor of President Trump. I want to bring in our correspondent, i believe we have garret headache aake on the hil his first appearance here on the hill. We have seen you a lot garret. We have some folks looking at that hearing, you have been looking at impeachment. Speaker pelosi has telegraphed a narrow case that could be pushed through judiciary, our colleague Geoff Bennett did not see the democrats splintering or holding other amendments here. They want to get this through you kn unified. What does your reporting show about that . Thats right. We have been starting to put the pieces together on a senate trial which is mostly fan
fiction of what you have been hearing about it that both sides speculated of what it looks like. We heard from Mitch Mcconnell yesterday afternoon saying theyll wait until the new year getting it started. It will push all
that you just erck voeked on the fisa side is since the reforms. the fixes, as you call them. can we get an unredacted. post date director, can we get an unredacted copy? can we at least get an unredacted copy on this memorandum? will find out if there s more of the document that could be shared with you. we try to be very careful on what we redact and there is also a basis for it and let me go back to see ifhere more that we can provide and my instructions are to be sparingly in what we provide. i think it s quite rich that the guy who has accused you of lawlessness and weaponization is 400 days into violation of his own congressional subpoena over january 6th. quite rich to me that you re hearing all of these allegations from somebody who won t even respond to a lawful subpoena. but i want to talk more about your workforce because that s where you started. a couple of weeks ago, at the bureau, you had family day.
the names of individuals who put this memo together? i m not sure. when it is we ll provide you an appropriate briefing. we ve already started putting in place a number of fixes and further informed by the results of the review. more training, more things. the same thing you told us on fisa. while you may have some improvement you have 240,000 the database was illegally searched. what are the training and procedures you are putting in place? i put the fisa stuff to the side. you told us the same thing you fixed something and you haven t. i do not believe the number you just invoked on the fisa side is since the reforms. the fixes as you called them. post date the numbers that you are referring to. can we get an unredacted copy while the investigation of this memorandum. i will find out if there is more of the document that be can shared with you. we ve tried to be careful in what we redact and always a basis for it.
issue that you identified and i talked about it earlier, i think it is different situations. on the fisa side, we found as you noted a lack of documentary of intentionality, we notice the lack of satisfaction and leaving open the possibilitity for the reasons you indicated. it is unclear what the motivations were. on the one happened, gross, incompetence and negligence. my point is your lack of evidence here is not evidence that there was no bias. it is solely correct on the actual evidence that we have. thank you very much. you did make a finding of that question, did you not?