They would not have to pay out of pocket and get reimbursed to that case. The contract is only for prescriptions related to that visit. They can still absolutely get coverage. So if they went in with a urinary tract action is by the way, amount of my prevention, they could get the acute care, were they couldnt get the prevention care that they run out of . They could get it, but they could get it out of pocket for that specific drug. We have just started this contract and i dont know how that will evolve in the future, but terrific for people travelling and those in College Students in other states, as well. I have one other update, we launched, as of yesterday, a single phone numbers to a wide for assistance in getting if their concerns about accessing Mental Health care within our system. For example, if a member has gone in and they are trying to schedule their first visit and they are not satisfied with how quickly, or the geography of where that visit will be, or they are trying t
Ease stand by] supervisor mandelman to implement ab 1784, so id like to make a motion to add that language. President yee okay. Theres a motion to amend. Is there a second . Seconded by supervisor peskin. If theres no objection, then well take these amendments outlined. [gavel]. President yee colleagues, can we take this item, same house, same call, as amended . Seeing no objection, then, this resolution passes unanimously. [gavel]. President yee number 62. Clerk 62 is a resolution to support the rights of San Francisco veterinary specialists. President yee supervisor ronen . Supervisor ronen yes. I am so proud to have the cosponsorship of every single colleague on this board. Thank you so much for standing by these workers. As i stated last week, sfvs is owned by v. C. A. , a company that owns 800 animal hospital. In 2018, v. C. A. Was purchased by mars, the candy company. The next step is for the company and union to negotiate a contract. That started 14 months ago, but unfortunately
Has been our consultant from Northern California Community Loan fund. Thank you, david. Thank you for helping me understand this weave of stuff and so forth. Leading the way to make sure that we anchor the new market tax credit that we needed for the project is the city of San Francisco and the San Francisco Community Investment fund, or as we call it sfif. Without them jumping in and p putting their projestamp on thi project, i dont know if othes s would have joined as easily. We just wareally want to thank e sfif for supporting us. Along side of the sfif, San Francisco sfif was california loan fund who in vvested with u early as well. The group that put us over the top is an Organization Called Community Impact partners which is more of a National Partner and they came in to push us forward as well. The irony is that two of these organizations are doing more than just giving us credits. Theyre actually funding our construction loan and thats Community Vision and Community Impact part
Projects and theyre aligned with these approved projects and then at the eback end take s a ba bank credit. At the end of the day thats going to deliver about 8. 1 million to this project. [ applause ]. I just want to really acknowledge the team that really have pushed this forward quickly on this project. First of all , david wilkin sos has been our consultant from Northern California Community Loan fund. Thank you, david. Thank you for helping me understand this weave of stuff and so forth. Leading the way to make sure that we anchor the new market tax credit that we needed for the project is the city of San Francisco and the San Francisco Community Investment fund, or as we call it sfif. Without them jumping in and p putting their projestamp on thi project, i dont know if othes s would have joined as easily. We just wareally want to thank e sfif for supporting us. Along side of the sfif, San Francisco sfif was california loan fund who in vvested with u early as well. The group that
Generated today about rule 20, to make two essential points. Number one, that obviously what is going on here by the way, rule 20 funds are generated by a charge to our utility bills, so everybody. So essentially whats been going on here for the last 12, 14 years is we, those who dont have undergrounding, have been paying for paying out of our utility bills for those people who have undergrounding. This drove our coalition to not try to find certain sections of the city that would get undergrounded, but the only equitable thing to be done is to have citywide undergrounding which is the master plan. On the issue of is undergrounding better to leave the wires up, 100,000 frenchmen cant be wrong. San diego is doing this at 12 to 15 miles a year and have been doing it for the last 10 or 12 years. Santa barbara is doing it. Berkley has commissioned a study to underground if theyre going to be doing it. I mean, the proof in the pudding is very much in the knowing here. Not only as supervisor