National organizations held a meeting in San Francisco so that we could be a part of the around prop 187 and see some of the and the organizer thing firsthand. So that was a really important part of my the early part of my career. And its coming full circle now today. And of course, the ripples prop 187 have been felt throughout the last 30 years, throughout my entire career. Today we have a really distinguished of panelists who are here to discuss prop 187 and its aftermath. Im going to introduce everybody very briefly here to my left, we have gustavo arellano. Hes columnist at the los angeles times, where he covers politics and issues in Southern California. He previously wrote a column called, ask a mexican, and that is also a book now. Correct. And hes also the author of taco usa how mexican conquered america. Next, we have veronica terriquez. She is a professor in the department of chicano and Central American studies, and she is a director of the Chicano Studies Research center a
National organizations held a meeting in San Francisco so that we could be a part of the around prop 187 and see some of the and the organizer thing firsthand. So that was a really important part of my the early part of my career. And its coming full circle now today. And of course, the ripples prop 187 have been felt throughout the last 30 years, throughout my entire career. Today we have a really distinguished of panelists who are here to discuss prop 187 and its aftermath. Im going to introduce everybody very briefly here to my left, we have gustavo arellano. Hes columnist at the los angeles times, where he covers politics and issues in Southern California. He previously wrote a column called, ask a mexican, and that is also a book now. Correct. And hes also the author of taco usa how mexican conquered america. Next, we have veronica terriquez. She is a professor in the department of chicano and Central American studies, and she is a director of the Chicano Studies Research center a
Okay, good afternoon and welcome to our first city and School District meeting for the year. I am jane kim and joined by supervisor mark farrell. And we will be shortly joined by supervisor avalos from the city end. And we have from the board of education, hydra mendoza and Rachel Norton and jill wynns. Our clerk today is rana calonsag. And we would like to recognize sfgov and those taping todays session. Madam clerk, any announcements . Seeing none. I would like to change order of the agenda and call up item 2 first, if thats okay with the committee . Okay, so we will be calling item 2 first. Madam clerk, can you please call item 2. Thank you, file number 130159, the hearing on shared scho scho schoolyards project. By member farrell. Thank you, i want to call up supervisor farrell and to make comments first. Thank you, chair kim, much appreciated. And its great to be here with all the school board members. Colleagues, today we will do a hearing and update on a shared schoolyards proje
Percent and the manager had no low scoring parks below 80 percent and so we intend to use that operating model as a model for others and what we notice with this particular manager and very timely and attentative response to the deficiencies that were pointed out in the park evaluations. Then, again, this is digging deeper, so that was kind of looking at over all scores and we rate 14 features in each park. Those are the list on the left tells you what we are looking at and again, a good news story over all, with rates, you know, at that 85 percent mark or above, we have one, excuse me, inconsistentcy in the little of the screen is the open space, that is the nonlandscape such as the interior, it is only rated on one quality, which is basically whether or not trash is present, that can fluctuate wildly and since it is not actively man taind nothing else is rated that effects the volatile nature of that score. The other three things that i wanted to point out since 0506 and we have had
To do it and we understand that we want to do it and why we get it we just havent figured out how we can do it. And we need to have need to work on it and the other part of that is, there has been the suggestion that you need to make the decision about the buildout in all of its details and how you fund it and how big it is before you do the roll out if that is true, then we probably cannot roll out this proem on the schedule that we have committed to and so we need to figure out some way and that is a major breech of expectation if not trust so if that is in fact a requirement we have some soul searching to do and so we have questions about the initial roll out and then we need to come up withfeasible roll out and thank you for the opportunity those are my thoughts at this point we will have something to act on, im sure later. Any other comment mr. Manager. Ill like to echo hoot commissioner just mentioned. I think the effort with lp i put forward was an idea that we can roll out a Pr