impose a full-fledged gag order on him. it s probably going to take a week for that to happen. you re saying a week. we can do the over/under on anyone who wants to play. i mean, look, contempt means jail, right? yes. the question then is does roger stone and his lawyers, instead of debating the core issues of this case where i have pointed out they have some reasonable arguments, do they want to spend their time arguing over what prejudices a jury? right. and it s interesting, the one person in america who bob mueller has alleged was victimized by roger stone is coming to his defense, at least on the limited issue of the gag order tonight. we have this here on the beat. ran randy credico says, quote, tonight, i m a first amendment purest, and even though i have been and will be the victim of roger stone s attacks, i have reservations about the gag order. john carlin, what do you think of that? look, i think this judge has
we have this here on the beat. randy cred aco says, quote, tonight, i m a first amendment purest, and even though i have been and will be the victim of roger stone s attacks, i have reservations about the gag order. john carlin, what do you think of that? look, i think this judge has shown she s quite serious about not turning her court into a circus. and not allowing jurors to be influenced unfairly, and not allowing witnesses to be tampered with. if you recall, she issued a similar gag order in the manafort case when they pushed the limits, she was not shy about telling him and his legal team that they better knock it off or she was going to enforce the order. i think stone ought to take notice of that. in terms of the first amendment, these are carefully crafted to balance the interest of having a fair trial and proceeding with