May it please the court. The warrant requirement for the home cannot be overthrown by the automobile exception. Under the commonwealths argument, on probable cause alone, an officer may search a vehicle anywhere that he finds it and may go anywhere that he needs to in order to access that vehicle. That rule cannot survive foundational for the amendment Fourth Amendment principles. This is presumptively unreasonable as this court recognizes. The more we ask this court to adopt is the automobile exception does not apply to a vehicle found in the home. The police have probable cause to believe that the vehicle is stolen. They even get a warrant. To inspect the vehicle. Is parked in the port. Warrant to go get the car for which they have a warrant . The war would specify the place to be searched for the car, so commonly, a word would say, for instance, the dwelling and curtilage to look for this motorcycle. So the warrant that authorizes the search of the motorcycle would, by its terms, au
Now, that doesnt mean that there isnt an issue where certain students views and certain groups have felt that they have received less active attention from the faculty and the administration. And i include conservative students in that group. They have received less public attention. And i think we need to meet those students where they are, and to help them to develop a place in our public conversation where they feel more included. And sound at 4 00 p. M. Eastern on real america, the 1987 film drug abuse, meeting the challenge. Anyone that says cocaines not addictive, they lie. When you do cocaine, you lie to yourself about being in control. Cocaines not hip. Its hype. Anyone who tells you its okay is a liar. Watch American History tv every weekend on cspan 3. This weekend the cspan cities tour takes you to new port, rhode island. With the help of communications center, well explore newports rich working library, and author peter keernan on shrinking the middle class. Its been the ce
Vehicle. That rule cannot survive foundational Fourth Amendment principles. Searches of the home in curtilage without a warrant are presumptively unreasonable as this court has often recognized. The rule we ask this court to adopt is that the automobile exception does not apply to a vehicle found in the curtilage of the home. Suppose the police have probable cause to believe that the vehicle is stolen, and they even get a warrant to inspect the vehicle, but the vehicle is parked in this port. Do they need a warrant to go get the car for which they have a warrant . Well, your honor, the warrant would specify the place to be searched for the car. And so commonly a warrant would say, for instance, the dwelling and curtilage to look for this motorcycle. So the warrant that authorizes the search of the motorcycle would, by its terms, authorize the intrusion into the curtilage. What if it didnt . So they have a warrant, here, lets say, to search for they have probable cause to search this th
They say collins trespassed the property and went beyond the limits. This oral argument lasts about an hour. Well hear case 161027 in the case of collins versus virginia. Mr. Fitzgerald . Thank you. May it please the court, it cannot be overthrown by the automobile exception. Under the commonwealths argument on propable cause alone, an officer maicer. A vehicle anywhere that he finds it and may go anywhere that he needs to in order to access that vehicle. That rule cannot survive foundational Fourth Amendment principles. Searches of the home in curtilage without a warrant are presumptively unreasonable as this court would often recognize. So the rule we ask this court to adopt is that the automobile exception does not apply to a vehicle found in the curtilage of the home. Suppose the police have probable cause to believe that the vehicle is stolen and they even get a warrant to inspect the vehicle, but the vehicle is parked in this port. Do they need do they need a warrant to go get th
Fourth amendment. This oral argument is about an hour. Well hear argument next in case 161027 collins versus virginia. The warrant requirement for the home cannot be overthrown by the automobile exception. Under the commonwealths argument, on probable cause alone, an officer may search a vehicle anywhere that he finds it, and may go anywhere that he needs to in order to access that vehicle. That rule cannot survive foundational Fourth Amendment principles. Searches of the home in curtilage without a warrant are presumptively unreasonable as this court has often recognized. The rule we ask this court to adopt is that the automobile exception does not apply to a vehicle found in the curtilage of the home. Suppose the police have probable cause to believe that the vehicle is stolen, and they even get a warrant to inspect the vehicle, but the vehicle is parked in this port. Do they need a warrant to go get the car for which they have a warrant . Well, your honor, the warrant would specify