appointments clause or the pardon power or the issue of indicting the president of united states, he is right on honestly and he s making the people who is criticizing him look like fools. where hell the is united states congress? then to ask mr. rosenstein since he recommended that comey has been fired. they need to ask about those memos out of the department justice what authority does he have to even contemplate indicting a president? why has he not violated the appointments clause of the constitution? article one! rated first in the constitution! they do not have to sit back and watch all this! they need to get involved! sean: that s why i call you the great one, mark. so importet this right. our constitutional republic depends on it. you can see him sunday night. don t miss it. watch his show.
sean: they think i am going to last a day. let me start with greg jarret. is there anything in my hoping monologue that the media is wrongly reporting. you a report and legal scholars are kraekt. the constitution is it silent and doesn t put a li on authority of the president to pardon any person. he could have initiated a doj. he can stop. sean: can me be charged with obstruction. no. in the case of michael flynn hoping is not obstruction. firing jamie comey can be done for a reason or none at all. sean: there was a piece when