more of this to happen, and i think it puts garland in a particularly difficult position in terms of moving forward as well. was the message the new york times reported that trump tried to send to attorney general garland improper? yes, i think it was very improper. we know he has zero fire walls between himself and the justice department. i think it was an act of desperation. but you know, his message, which was sort of offering to bring down the heat, as though that s something that, you know, he wouldn t do normally like he would need to be requested to do that to me sounded like a veiled quid pro quo. we ve seen that movie before, the i hope you can see your way to letting this go , and i found those kind of undertones in that. look, if you re the former president of the united states, if people are committing
federal government our lawyers judicial watch then mandated production a receive will redacted documents so this is strategy. from ni hi to use taxpayer money and very expensive taxpayer funded litigation to keep taxpayer in the dark. now acting ni hi director responded to your investigation. watch. would you do no conflict where appearance ever conflict of information? i certainly can understands it might seem as appearance, but and this sort of thing ma maybe we could work together on so that we can explain to you the fire walls that we do have in place. because they are significant substantial. adam the fire walls, that s just make me want to burst out into laughter if not peels of laughter. do you buy any of this? i am not buying it. we didn t even no who knew that over the course of last ten
Military families they are speaking to make, and what its like to be one of them. And so they speak obviously from their own personal experience. And, you know, we will tune in when the president starts speaking about what message he wants to send this memorial day. We know this has long been something that the first lady has made a priority. She, even as second lady, during the obama administration, working with the former first Lady Michelle obama, made working with and supporting military families a priority, a project that they made sure stayed at the forefront of the administration. And thats something they are continuing to do memorial day weekend. Lets listen flou to the first lady, dr. Jill biden. And we must do everything we can to help them carry the weight of their grief, and always, always honor their service. Ten years ago first Lady Michelle obama and i created joining joining forces. And this work continues to be one of my Top Priorities today. We are going to make sure
to the olympic committee and like not only talk about perhaps telling people to bring a separate phone, a burner phone, we should be providing them with all the warnings the fire walls we can, be careful to email to anyone. go and do your performance and do the best you can, and get home safely. this is a country that doesn t really engage in freedom of speech. they don t really engage in freedom of the press, and so though you may be used to those types of things here in the united states, it s not there, and we know and countries like this and north korea, they may find any reason they want to arrest somebody. i think people have to be careful, it s a very aggressive regime, we see what they are doing in taiwan, they bully their neighbors all the time and we have seen even in my district they were in general electric aviation trying to steal secrets and with the fbi they were able to be caught. this is everywhere, and you had a piece earlier about supply chain and i want to address t
reportedly as small as confetti. so josh, i know you, when you tear up a document, you tend to eat the pieces, too so no one can get their hands on them, but switching gears, to a more serious matter, president biden when it comes to these investigations has been very hands-off, he said look i m not involved, it s congress, department of justice, there are fire walls here. but there s been increasing pressure from democrats who are listening, particularly in recent days to some of the incendiary rhetoric from the former president, and saying look, we can t take any chances. is there any chance the white house will change their posture here and try to be a little more involved even in terms of just the rhetoric about these probes into trump and january 6th? i think there is, i think we re seeing jen psaki kind of leaned into it a yesterday a little bit highlights that remark from trump, where he said the pardon and mic mike pence