as researchers out on television. it was a year before he was fired that the new york times told the world and the fox board that tiger carlson was the most racist show in the history of cable news. that is from the very careful and restrained new york times, that doesn t easily make statements like that. the fox board read that a year before tucker carlson was fired. private racism could not get a public racist fired at fox. there is more. there has to be. which is why the new york times in other news organizations are trying to get the redacted parts of discovery evidence. the modern version of fighting, the white-collar version is lawyering.
world, including here in this country. i mean you look at this lawyers of naylor merrick, and s whatever, colonial terror all over the world, and the holocaust. and not only that, you don t have to look far back. right now we are engaged in a very dishonourable war, conducted by a white man who was representing a majority, overwhelmingly, white country, and that is russia, and putin, someone who is, tucker carlson himself has praised. that part makes zero sense. and then there, is i think, the more interesting psychological thing but you are hinting at, which was, the bloodlust. his first impulse s bloodlust. that he, he taps into this thing that we have seen throughout the world and thrown american history which is knowledge mob analogy. i always wondered, how did the
closest tucker carlson has ever been to a street fight is the one that he was watching in that video. but he believes, based on absolutely nothing but racism, it s not how white men fight. i have seen white men fight like that. i know white men who have fought like that. it was all white men, teenagers and their parents, who surrounded a friend of mine in boston s all-white neighborhood of charles town i was in high school and stabbed him, a wounded he managed to survive as we fled the scene, with my brother driving the car to the hospital. tucker carlson has never experienced those white men in action. that video was the first time tucker carlson saw white men doing something he thought they didn t do. his first impulse was about how great it was. what a deeply sick mind.
one is the one that you picked up on which is tucker carlson tries to leave white man out of the equation of dishonourable fighting, that is, makes no sense and is kind of laughable. part of this is because the white supremacy that undergirds that statement the only way you can believe in white supremacy is a lie to self allied others. the idea that you either believe this or you say this to yourself or you say this to others means that you are trying to lie your way out of where the truth is about humanity, which is that regardless of race, there are people who are honorable in dishonourable both in their daily lives and in their fighting in their wars. there is no way to read that history of mankind and not see that white men have also been part of the dishonourable fighting and conflict in the
surely have let out one of those horrible monstrous carlson cackles that he alone seems to think is the sound of human laughter, that noise tucker carlson makes has been wrongly described is a childish giggle. a child s giggle is not full of hatred and cruelty. the sound tucker carlson makes and his most joyce joyous, his most happy moments, when he is laughing, is a sound that oscar wilde surely would have called monstrous. the marcus of queensbury was a member of the social class of the british previously call nobility. there has never been anything noble about them. but they believe in their own nobility in the same way that tucker carlson believes in his.