calling names im good. How are you. Good. Im rue been i have 3 seven years in the Fire Services and 15 years as the fire chief in the city of paling to and then director of calfire. During my time there we started up one firefighter system so i had the installation and training and ongoing maintenance of a system as far backing back as the 1990s. I had a positive experience and my firefighters had a positive experience with the installing of the installation. During my time at calfire director systems were in state occupied building sworn testimony. There were 10 believes that had air remresht systems. And that was at the cal epa building and at the state Attorney Generals Office while i was the director at cal. I want to talk about the process having gone through the International Co councils process of daumgsz. It was mentioned this was supported by the organization of the largest firefighter by cal professional firefighters the second Largest Union in the state and by california fir
Option for 75 to 1 hundred feet to pick between the elevator or the system. For the current code cycle or are you talking about history. I understand that the state level at 1 hundred and 20 feet our required to do the sir, elevator below 120 theres no state code why didnt we decide to give them the option of picking between the systems. Thank you. Next speaker if the building wants to put in the fire system they can; right . But it would be on top of the elevator. Right. I thought you said in san jose they can pick between the two. Its basically, the same so at that 75 feet youre required to put in a fire system but if you want to do the expectation for the elevator then the fire system goes way; right . Right but you cant put in the fire system and not put in the elevator. He can. Right. Either 75 or 120 . Right it all depended on on the building. I know that anyone can install this on top of our requirements but its a chriss choice between one or the other. I would say its a choice
Prevention officers. And i participated in the fire marshalls committee in which the firefighters went into the process and no point during that conversation was it as given at a coefficients i have a few questions id ask this question to the department about the trend in terms of codes and specifically it requiring this as opposed to making it on option. Could you compliment on that and where respect to the proposed change International Code i guess it was appendix k could i comment on that and the department indicated if its an appendix its optional not required when an item is an appendix item its not in place until its adopted but once adopted it is in place if its not adopted its a recognized standard that has been used. It wasnt a requirement in the code so you have two optioned one is you adopt it for law or you dont adopt it. The trends is the opposite direction that San Francisco is going. Your leaders in the development of system you phoenix and a few other sections have push
Attorney Generals Office while i was the director at cal. I want to talk about the process having gone through the International Co councils process of daumgsz. It was mentioned this was supported by the organization of the largest firefighter by cal professional firefighters the second Largest Union in the state and by california fire you chiefs operations and Fire Prevention officers. And i participated in the fire marshalls committee in which the firefighters went into the process and no point during that conversation was it as given at a coefficients i have a few questions id ask this question to the department about the trend in terms of codes and specifically it requiring this as opposed to making it on option. Could you compliment on that and where respect to the proposed change International Code i guess it was appendix k could i comment on that and the department indicated if its an appendix its optional not required when an item is an appendix item its not in place until its