prof trump is delivering on a campaign promise to get a better deal. the certifying is the first ste step. if iran continues to deny inspectors to come on military bases, we will re-oppose sanctions. if iran continues to test fire missiles, we will re-impose sanctions. if they continue to be the largest state sponsor of terrorism we will reimpose sanctions. president trump did a really good thing trying to get the world to focus on a better deal. at the end of 15 years, the iranians can do whatever they want, the sunset clause has no limitations. this deal really ensures them to get a bond and we are trying to get a better deal. i think president trump has done the world a service here by revisiting this agreement. harris: i had the former
there s no way jeff sessions can hang on as attorney general just a couple of weeks ago because scaramucci was knocking him and kellyanne conway wasn t fully defending him and that sort of thing. the new cycle moves so fast, we could get caught up and drift off somewhere else in the next couple of days and this whole story blows over. that s also a legitimate possibility. shannon: this is not your typical august because nothing seems to slow down with his administration. for at least four years, will be very busy. good to see you guys. bill: tomorrow, two growing international crises also pit facing the president. a fresh saber rattling from iran as a standoff with north korea deepens. we are now hearing kim jong-un will hold off on ordering a test of fire missiles toward guam. iran meanwhile is issuing new threats of its own. the president saying iran will quit the nuclear deal within hours he says if the u.s. imposes more sanctions against tehran. but not everyone thinks that wou
iranians billions of dollars, and we all know what happened last time we gave billions to north korea, they added news on our watch. warm is in the crosshairs. we base a lot of the b-52 bombers over there. they will be flying these missions over north korea if they don t watch out. next week, north korea says they will test fire missiles off the waters of want. what will president trump do if we get a warning that those missiles will be fired because, they re not that accurate. who knows where they could land. they threatened to do some kind of disney appliquéd where they put one missile, north, south and east of the island. as i said, they re not that good. i don t think we should wait until they actually do that. i think the threat of doing that is actually outrageous enough. you re talking preemptive strike.
iranians billions of dollars, and we all know what happened last time we gave billions to north korea, they added news on our watch. warm is in the crosshairs. we base a lot of the b-52 bombers over there. they will be flying these missions over north korea if they don t watch out. next week, north korea says they will test fire missiles off the waters of want. what will president trump do if we get a warning that those missiles will be fired because, they re not that accurate. who knows where they could land. they threatened to do some kind of disney appliquéd where they put one missile, north, south and east of the island. as i said, they re not that good. i don t think we should wait until they actually do that. i think the threat of doing that is actually outrageous enough. you re talking preemptive strike.
you have been covering this part of the world for a very long time, jamie. what about the policy? what about this administration s particular policy as it relates to north korea has changed? well, you know, the clear thing that has changed is the tone of the rhetoric when we hear things like fire and fury and solutions are locked and loaded. and by the way, we ve heard slightly more tempered versions of that, but the same message from the defense secretary, jim mattis, who said to reporters who were traveling with him yesterday that, yes, he said i have military options, and yes, he said, there s a military solution. so those kinds of comments feed into that. and as just has been discussed, the problem with escalating the rhetoric and coming to a level of brinkmanship is that it does raise the risk of miscalculation. so, you know, the u.s. is trying to intimidate north korea so they won t fire missiles in the direction of guam, although in the past, we have been happy to let nort