ballistic missiles, let alone this chinese gliding factional orbital bombardment system. so, the reality is that the us has long been vulnerable to chinese nuclear attack. this does not change the status quote. so attack. this does not change the status quote- status quote. so i suppose the ruestion status quote. so i suppose the question is status quote. so i suppose the question is if status quote. so i suppose the question is if you status quote. so i suppose the question is if you cannot - status quote. so i suppose the question is if you cannot take l status quote. so i suppose the - question is if you cannot take these missiles down antimissile system, then you have to fight fire fight fire with fire, which brings us to the question are we in a new arms race? ~ ,., ., ., ,., , race? well, so, there are two points that, when race? well, so, there are two points that. when you race? well, so, there are two points that, when you say race? well, so, there are two points
or save money with money. joining me out in white house press secretary and senior strategist, bill burton. bill, good to have you here. thanks for having me. absolutely. there is two sides of this, right? fire fight with fire. then there is the site of we are in the business of taking corporate money. first, let s address the first point. you no he what, actually let me let you respond to senator becau because. let me play a clip. i emphasize the ability to fight fire with fire. but democrats should just never be in the business of taking unlimited corporate contributions. it is dancing with the devil, even it is a game we ll never win. what do you think of that, bill? here is the question. do you want karl rove as the koch brothers to have unlinlitied with no response