we won t get them from the administration. you saw from those political operatives that they have talking about this that their response to criticism is ad hominem arguments. they are not capable of responding. the tragedy on september 11 was a reflection of a failed obama administration world view, a view that the arab spring had brought democrat to libya in the middle-east, generally, that al qaeda is defeated and the war on terrorism is over. that s what led to the decisions well before the attack in benghazi. not to give enhanced security despite repeated requests from the people on the ground. that s why that cable that fox news came up with that katherine has reported, should have been a fire bell in the night at the state department when it came back to washington, almost four weeks before the attack. i have relied on the great reporting by katherine herig and
strike than israel. greta: what do you think of the whispering we caught on the mike with russia? in which he said that after the election, he will have more frexibility? i think it s reprehensible. it s all about him. it is not that the country s in, that we postpone new yorks. it s give me a little space and i will be more flexible toward you once the election is over. now, he doesn t need the flexibility to be tough or russia. he needs it to be able to give more away. to me, that s a fire bell in the night that voters really need to consider. if he does it here who, else is he doing it with? he will have a new person to deal with shortly. a new president putin. we ll see what happens from that. thank you. thank you. greta: five police officers, just murdered. mexico is a war zone. who would be brave enough to go in with a camera? our next guest is. he has seen it and it s all on camera. a katie perry boycott?
strike than israel. greta: what do you think of the whispering we caught on the mike with russia? in which he said that after the election, he will have more frexibility? i think it s reprehensible. it s all about him. it is not that the country s in, that we postpone new yorks. it s give me a little space and i will be more flexible toward you once the election is over. now, he doesn t need the flexibility to be tough or russia. he needs it to be able to give more away. to me, that s a fire bell in the night that voters really need to consider. if he does it here who, else is he doing it with? he will have a new person to deal with shortly. a new president putin. we ll see what happens from that. thank you. thank you. greta: five police officers, just murdered. mexico is a war zone. who would be brave enough to go in with a camera? our next guest is. he has seen it and it s all on camera. a katie perry boycott?
president implied had to come back up to speed it is a real threat. that s why when you hear the president again giving way on american missile defense, defending our homeland, that is why i say it s a fire bell in the night. this is something that verges on the irresponsible for a president of the united states to say that to another world leader. jon: i wondered if the asked to the former soviet state of georgia how they feel about the russians after russia moved in and attacked them several summers ago and obliterated so much of that country, how they feel about russia and its taste for freedom? well, exactly. you will recall in august of 2008 when the russians did invade, then candidate obama called on both the george against and the russians, called on both sides to exercise restraint. that s like saying to the kid on the ground when the schoolyard bully is pounding them that both of those kids ought to exercise restraint. this is a signal of weakness
by our president, a very revealing, obviously candid comment that he didn t think anybody else was going to overhear that our adversaries around the world understand is a sign of weakness and our friends worry about. this is real fire bell in the night. the white house will not wish this one away. jon: when it comes to missile defense and the size of our nuclear arsenal the president said he wants to drastically reduce the size of our nuclear arsenal. are those the kinds of things he could push through in a second term without maybe, well without having to answer to the voters certainly and maybe without necessarily heeding congress? well, there are a lots of indications the president already decided to take exactly that route to avoid the treaty mechanism and senate, requirement, constitutional requirement for senate approval. and this is something that in the national security field where the constitution obviously gives the