comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Fiona philipp - Page 3 : comparemela.com

Philipp v Barclays Bank - Supreme Court judgment finds payment service providers are not liable to reimburse victims of APP fraud

Barclays wins appeal over bank transfer fraud ruling

The Supreme Court said it was not the bank s responsibility to concern itself with the wisdom or risks of its customer s payment decisions .

Banks May Be Liable For Push Payment Fraud, Court Rules

An appeals court ruled on Monday that banks could be liable if they fail to protect individual customers against push payment fraud, extending the scope of a key legal obligation in a lawsuit against Barclays over a £700,000 ($913,000) scam. 

Barclays Fights Appeal Over Liability For Push Payment Fraud

A customer who lost £700,000 ($948,600) to a push payment fraud has urged the Court of Appeal to find that Barclays had a duty to protect her from the scam and order the financial services giant to pay back the lost cash.

Barclays right not to pay out after couple scammed out of £700,000

Barclays right not to pay out after couple scammed out of £700,000 Daily Record 20/01/2021 Emma Munbodh & Kirsten McStay A woman who was conned into handing over £700,000 to a fraud investigation team , has lost every single penny - and her bank don t need to pay out. Fiona Philipp transferred two sums of money from her Barclays bank account - one amounting to £400,000 and another £300,000 - to accounts in the United Arab Emirates back in 2018. She and her husband were under the impression that they were helping a serious fraud investigation being run by the city watchdog, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). However, the couple were defrauded, and, in a ruling today, a judge said Barclays is not liable to compensate for any losses.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.