Attack from appearing before committee will amount to obstruction, saying in a statement, quote, the moment to prevent testimony from being heard has long since past. Eightyfirst attorney general of the United States. So let me ask you about the criticism level in the last week against attorney general william barr for summary of the Mueller Report and then conclusion that there was no obstruction. Is that fair criticism . First of all, summary of 400 page report. And he i think likely summarized and summarized the adverse. Paul it wasnt exoneration. Not an exoneration and no criminal collusion. Paul what about letting copying see redacted parts of the report, he will let them come out except the grand jury testimony. Is that a fair compromise . Thats a fair compromise. Maybe unnecessary one. Let them see. The redactions are very limited. I think its less than 6 of the total redacted and including Ongoing Investigation or ongoing case. Paul right. He said he will do that. The exception
Paul the subpoena threat coming after attorney general william barr said last week hed release a redacted version of the 400page report no later than mid april. George terwilliger served in the george h. W. Bush administration. Welcome, good to see you. Thanks for coming in. As a matter of law, what is the attorney general required to turn over to Congress Regarding the Mueller Investigation . Well, its entirely in his discretion. What hes really required to do, hes already done; that is, tell them that he got the report, and he actually went beyond that, paul, as you know paul right. To summarize the, quote, principal conclusions in that report. But its also entirely evident from all the publiclyavailable information that the a. G. Is committed to transparency and is trying to get as much of the report to the congress and to the public, i might add, as the law allows. Paul so what about this, the argument that the a. G. Made that you have grand jury testimony, for example, that you ne