played for you for legal reasons. you are not to make any inferences for or against either party in the case about the fact that the law does not allow the playing of certain recordings by the parties in this case. now, evidence of prior difficulties or lack thereof between one or more of the defendants and mr. arbery has been admitted for the sole purpose of illustrating, if it does, the state of feeling between the defendants and mr. arbery and reasonableness of any alleged fears by the defendants or mr. arbery. whether this evidence illustrates such matters is a matter for you the jury to determine. but you are not to consider such evidence for any other purposes. certain evidence of fingerprint comparison has been admitted by the court for your possible consideration. identification by fingerprint comparison is opinion evidence
and is dependent on the credibility or believability or accuracy of the expert witness called for that purpose as well as the following factors. one, the validity of the theory of identification by fingerprint comparison. two, the credibility of the witness who performs other necessary functions in making the comparison, such as inked finger impressions and latent lifts. and, three, the accuracy of procedures in identifying, preserving, recording and maintaining integrity of the physical evidence, all of which are questions for the jury. now, the defendants are charged with crimes against the laws of this state. a crime is a violation of a statute of this state in which there is a joint operation of act and intention. intent is an essential element of any crime and must be proved by the state beyond a reasonable doubt.
inferences for or against either party in the case about the fact that the law does not allow the playing of certain recordings by the parties in this case. now, evidence of prior difficulties or lack thereof between one or more of the defendants and mr. arbery has been admitted for the sole purpose of illustrating if it does the state of feeling between the defendants and mr. arbery and the reasonableness of any alleged fears by the defendants or mr. arbery. whether this evidence ill illustrates such matters is a matter solely for you, the jury, to determine. but you are not to consider such evidence for any other purposes. certain evidence of fingerprint comparison has been admitted by the court for your possible consideration. identification by fingerprint comparison is opinion evidence and is dependent upon the credibility or believability and
accuracy of the expert witness called for that purpose as well as the following factors one, the validity of the theory of fingerprint comparison. two, the credibility of the witness who performs other necessary functions in making the comparison, such as inked finger impressions and latent lifts. and, three, the accuracy of procedures in identifying, preserving, recording, and maintaining integrity of the physical evidence, all of which are questions for the jury. now, the defendant are charged with crimes gen s against the l this state. a crime is a violation of a statute of this state in which there is a joint operation of an act and intention. intent is an essential element of any crime and must be proved by the state beyond a reasonable doubt. intent may be shown in many
0 there he goes. this is the white truck. he s still underneath here. here comes somebody to the truck. he s right there. here comes greg mcmichael-he comes around. he gets in. then mr. albenze starts walking down the street. truck pulls out. there goes his arm. there goes his arm. where is the truck? already pulled out. already pulled out and heading down the street. all right. should you trust the statements of travis mcmichael? well, let s go ahead and first take a look at this. he told you he s not going to chase or investigate someone who is armed, and yet all he talked about was, he kept reaching into his pants, kept reaching into his pocket. well, did you think he was armed or not? then what did he tell you? this is what i was thinking. mr. arbery may have run by. maybe matt had seen him. maybe he has broken in. maybe harry english is over at 220. i don t know. maybe ahmaud arbery was caught. maybe ahmaud arbery was trying to run from the police. these are all maybes. he doesn t