it and carried it out of the nsa office by hand. and then there was another clue, and this is where the story gets a little bit crazy, most color printers, maybe even all of this, i don t know, they apparently leave behind when they print, when they print out a piece of paper from a computer, right, when they print, they leave behind a finger print on every sheet that they print out. you know how an old school detective stories they do forensic analysis of individual type writers who figure out which typewriter typed out the ransom note. that is for computer printers too. and that is may have come acalling when the intercept showed the nsa this document they had obtained through a source because they wanted the nsa to validate it, to comment on whether or not this document they had received was real. in that document, which we have access to, because they published it online when they
office by hand. then there was another clue. this is where the story gets a little bit crazy. most color printers, maybe even all of them, i don t know, they apparently leave behind when they print right, when they print out a piece of paper from a computer, right? when they print, they leave behind a finger print on every sheet that they print out. you know how in old school detective stories they do the forensics of typewriters. there is a version of that for computer printers, too. and that may have come acalling when the intercept showed the nsa this document they had obtained through a source, because they wanted the nsa to validate it. to comment on whether or not this document they had received was real. in that document, which we have access to, because they published it online, when they published their story, in that document, along the plainly
kelly. how do you know russia is behind this? there is no finger print, a 3-year-old could have hacked this and you wouldn t be able to find out. ironically just yesterday, vladimir putin sort of bragged about the fact it might be patriotic russians who are behind this. just not the government. is there some certainty as to who hacks anything? attribution is very, very hard. if you don t have the exact human behind the key board, you re doing a lot of inference and guessing and putting a lot of circumstantial pieces together to hopefully get a full story. just like normal investigations, a lot of it is get the confession or get them to admit and get the human aspect to it. so it is very difficult. given what the dhs has put out publicly about what they call the election hack, the complex nature of it is not child s
and a lot said here at home as to what our next steps will be. and we are joined by rand paul, 2016 republican candidate. and you listened along with us from what we know from france and the news we heard. what do we do next here at home? i think no one knows. but our sympathies lie with the french and hope we get to the bottom of it quickly as to who instituted the attacks. we have to be prepared and cautious about who visits. in bowling, kentucky. we had two refugee come and attempted to buy stinger missiles. one of them had a finger print from a bomb fragment. and he was on a known list. and two boston bombers came here as refugees, and it is absurd that the women and children are
terrorist responsible for that siege at batacian was identified from the finger print. he was never in prison but given an s- record and never implicated in a case or known association with with a terrorist criminal. of all of them. they used assault roifls and identical explosive designed to cause fatalities. each one had suicide vest containing a volatile explosive and had batteries. the video footage in paris targeted a black vehicle registered in belgium. it was rented by a french resident in belgium. this individual was stopped in